Abstract:Abstract Cotranslational folding is expected to occur when the folding speed of the nascent chain is faster than the translation speed of the ribosome, but it is difficult to predict which proteins cotranslationally fold. Here, we simulate evolution of model proteins to investigate how native structure influences evolution of cotranslational folding. We developed a model that connects protein folding during and after translation to cellular fitness. Model proteins evolved improved folding speed and stability, with proteins adopting one of two strategies for folding quickly. Low contact order proteins evolve to fold cotranslationally. Such proteins adopt native conformations early on during the translation process, with each subsequently translated residue establishing additional native contacts. On the other hand, high contact order proteins tend not to be stable in their native conformations until the full chain is nearly extruded. We also simulated evolution of slowly translating codons, finding that slowing translation at certain positions enhances cotranslational folding. Finally, we investigated real protein structures using a previously published dataset that identified evolutionarily conserved rare codons in E. coli genes and associated such codons with cotranslational folding intermediates. We found that protein substructures preceding conserved rare codons tend to have lower contact orders, in line with our finding that lower contact order proteins are more likely to fold cotranslationally. Our work shows how evolutionary selection pressure can cause proteins with local contact topologies to evolve cotranslational folding. Statement of significance Substantial evidence exists for proteins folding as they are translated by the ribosome. Here we developed a biologically intuitive evolutionary model to show that avoiding premature protein degradation can be a sufficient evolutionary force to drive evolution of cotranslational folding. Furthermore, we find that whether a protein’s native fold consists of more local or more nonlocal contacts affects whether cotranslational folding evolves. Proteins with local contact topologies are more likely to evolve cotranslational folding through nonsynonymous mutations that strengthen native contacts as well as through synonymous mutations that provide sufficient time for cotranslational folding intermediates to form.

Protein evolution speed depends on its stability and abundance and on chaperone concentrations

Molecular Chaperones Accelerate the Evolution of Their Protein Clients in Yeast

Selection maintaining protein stability at equilibrium

A billion years of evolution manifest in nanosecond protein dynamics

Why highly expressed proteins evolve slowly

High temperature delays and low temperature accelerates evolution of a new protein phenotype

Determinants of the rate of protein sequence evolution

Protein Misinteraction Avoidance Causes Highly Expressed Proteins to Evolve Slowly.

Interplay between Chaperones and Protein Disorder Promotes the Evolution of Protein Networks

The role of evolutionary selection in the dynamics of protein structure evolution

Functional optimization in distinct tissues and conditions constrains the rate of protein evolution

Causes of evolutionary rate variation among protein sites

Effect of protein structure on evolution of cotranslational folding

Stability and the Evolvability of Function in a Model Protein

Evolution is not uniform along coding sequences

Impact of Translational Error‐induced and Error‐free Misfolding on the Rate of Protein Evolution

Protein Evolution is Potentially Governed by Protein Stability: Directed Evolution of an Esterase from the Hyperthermophilic Archaeon Sulfolobus tokodaii

The Influence of Codon Usage, Protein Abundance, and Protein Stability on Protein Evolution Vary by Evolutionary Distance and the Type of Protein

The Hypercube of Life: How Protein Stability Imposes Limits on Organism Complexity and Speed of Molecular Evolution

Evolution of Protein Structure and Stability in Global Warming

Hsp90 shapes protein and RNA evolution to balance trade-offs between protein stability and aggregation