Abstract:Abstract Since the origin of life, temperatures on earth have fluctuated both on short and long time scales. How such changes affect the rate at which Darwinian evolution can bring forth new phenotypes remains unclear. On the one hand, high temperature may accelerate phenotypic evolution because it accelerates most biological processes. On the other hand, it may slow phenotypic evolution, because proteins are usually less stable at high temperatures and therefore less evolvable. Here, to test these hypotheses experimentally, we evolved a green fluorescent protein in E. coli towards the new phenotype of yellow fluorescence at different temperatures. Yellow fluorescence evolved most slowly at high temperature and most rapidly at low temperature, in contradiction to the first hypothesis. Using high-throughput population sequencing, protein engineering, and biochemical assays, we determined that this is due to the protein-destabilizing effect of neofunctionalizing mutations. Destabilization is highly detrimental at high temperature, where neofunctionalizing mutations cannot be tolerated. Their detrimental effects can be mitigated through excess stability at low temperature, leading to accelerated adaptive evolution. By modifying protein folding stability, temperature alters the accessibility of mutational paths towards high-fitness genotypes. Our observations have broad implications for our understanding of how temperature changes affect evolutionary adaptations and innovations.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how temperature changes affect the evolution rate of new protein phenotypes. Specifically, the researchers wanted to understand how high and low temperatures affect the ability of green fluorescent protein (GFP) to evolve into yellow fluorescent protein in Escherichia coli. The core of this problem lies in exploring how temperature affects the accessibility of new phenotype evolution by changing protein - folding stability, and the impact of these changes on adaptive evolution. ### Research Background The temperature on the earth fluctuates on both short - and long - time scales. How these temperature changes affect the rate of new phenotype generation in the Darwinian evolution process is still unclear. On the one hand, high temperature may accelerate phenotype evolution because it accelerates most biological processes; on the other hand, high temperature may also slow down phenotype evolution because proteins are usually more unstable at high temperatures and thus more difficult to evolve new functions. To test these hypotheses, the researchers experimentally evolved a green fluorescent protein (GFP) at different temperatures to make it evolve into the new phenotype of yellow fluorescent protein. ### Experimental Design The researchers conducted five rounds of mutation and selection experiments at 25°C (low temperature), 37°C (medium temperature), and 44°C (high temperature). In each round of selection, only the top 0.5% of yellow - fluorescent cells were allowed to survive. Single - cell fluorescence phenotypes were quantified by fluorescence - activated cell sorting (FACS), and the evolution dynamics were monitored using single - molecule real - time sequencing (SMRT). ### Main Findings 1. **Effect of Temperature on Evolution Rate**: - High temperature (44°C) delayed the evolution of the yellow - fluorescent phenotype. - Low temperature (25°C) accelerated the evolution of the yellow - fluorescent phenotype. - The evolution rate at medium temperature (37°C) was in between. 2. **Role of Gene Mutations**: - Through SMRT sequencing, the researchers identified 13 mutations with a frequency of more than 20% in at least one replicate population, and 7 of these mutations occurred in multiple replicate populations. - Four high - frequency mutations (S66G, I168T, I168V, C204Y) were considered neofunctionalization mutations, which significantly changed the excitation and emission spectra of GFP, making it evolve into yellow fluorescent protein. - These neofunctionalization mutations spread more rapidly at low temperatures and more slowly at high temperatures. 3. **Role of Stabilizing Mutations**: - Three high - frequency mutations (F65L, V164A, I172V) did not change the excitation and emission spectra of the fluorescent protein but increased the thermodynamic stability and folding ability of the protein. - These stabilizing mutations were most beneficial at high temperatures and least beneficial at low temperatures. 4. **Interaction Effects**: - There are non - additive (phenotypic) interactions between neofunctionalization mutations and stabilizing mutations. For example, the double mutant C204Y + I168T had a smaller increase in fitness at high temperatures and a larger increase in fitness at low temperatures. - High temperature weakened the negative phenotypic interactions between these mutations, resulting in a smaller increase in fitness of the double mutant at high temperatures. ### Conclusion This study shows that temperature affects the accessibility of new phenotype evolution by changing protein - folding stability. Low temperature accelerates adaptive evolution by reducing the destabilizing effects of neofunctionalization mutations; while high temperature delays adaptive evolution by intensifying these destabilizing effects. These findings are of great significance for understanding how temperature changes affect biological evolution.

High temperature delays and low temperature accelerates evolution of a new protein phenotype

Warmer Temperatures Enhance Beneficial Mutation Effects

Evolution of Protein Structure and Stability in Global Warming

Phenotypic fluctuation rendered by a single genotype and evolutionary rate

Protein evolution speed depends on its stability and abundance and on chaperone concentrations

Laboratory evolution reveals transcriptional mechanisms underlying thermal adaptation of

Pervasive divergence in protein thermostability is mediated by both structural changes and cellular environments

Transition from Positive to Neutral in Mutation Fixation along with Continuing Rising Fitness in Thermal Adaptive Evolution

Bacterial Transcriptome Reorganization in Thermal Adaptive Evolution

Adaptations of protein structure and function to temperature: there is more than one way to ‘skin a cat’

Rapid adaptive evolution of microbial thermal performance curves

Genomic analysis of laboratory-evolved, heat-adapted strains

Low Temperature Adaptation is Not the Opposite Process of High Temperature Adaptation in Terms of Changes in Amino Acid Composition

High-throughput quantification of protein structural change reveals potential mechanisms of temperature adaptation in Mytilus mussels

Metabolic rearrangement enables adaptation of microbial growth rate to temperature shifts

Genome dynamics and temperature adaptation during experimental evolution of obligate intracellular bacteria

Evolution of Escherichia coli for growth at high temperatures

Effects of Genetic and Physiological Divergence on the Evolution of a Sulfate-Reducing Bacterium under Conditions of Elevated Temperature

Thermal Adaptation in Viruses and Bacteria

Evolution of Escherichia coli rifampicin resistance in an antibiotic-free environment during thermal stress

Temperature variability interacts with mean temperature to influence the predictability of microbial phenotypes