Pro-Social Solutions in Residential Environments Created as a Result of Participatory Design

Katarzyna Kołacz,Anna Podlasek
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020510
IF: 3.9
2024-01-06
Sustainability
Abstract:The pro-social dimension of contemporary housing is one of the main postulates of sustainability. The work aims to draw attention to the residential environment created as a result of participatory design and to examine how and to what extent it supports the creation of social contacts and the identification of inhabitants with their place of residence. The study included three housing projects prepared by the communities: B.R.O.T Aspern, Seestern Aspern, and LiSA. They are part of one urban block located in Aspern, part of the 22nd district of Vienna—Donaudstadt. The case studies were analysed using the same ten evaluation criteria. They were established based on previously developed theories of sociologists, psychologists and architects on the features of architecture and spaces supporting the formation of neighbourly contacts and the identification of users with their place of residence. The research showed that although the same evaluation criteria were used, each design group found an individual way to meet them in their project such as innovative design elements, unique community spaces, or user-driven features. This is proof that not only the place where architecture is created, has its conditions, and the planners and architects creating the project give it an individual, pro-social character, but also the users who create it. However, it is important to create an appropriate organizational, legal architectural and urban framework for the participation process to be successful.
environmental sciences,environmental studies,green & sustainable science & technology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to explore how the residential environment created through participatory design supports the establishment of social connections and residents' sense of identity with their place of residence. Specifically, the authors hope to examine, by analyzing three residential projects designed with community participation - B.R.O.T Aspern, Seestern Aspern and LiSA - to what extent these projects have promoted social interaction and enhanced residents' sense of belonging to their place of residence. In addition, the study also aims to prove the following research hypothesis: the participation of future users helps to create unique and social architectural solutions. To achieve this goal, the authors adopted ten evaluation criteria based on previous theorists (including sociologists, psychologists and architects) regarding spatial characteristics that promote the formation of neighborhood relationships and support the connection between users and their place of residence, and conducted a detailed analysis of these three cases. These criteria include, but are not limited to, the optimal scale of residential areas and residential units, residential buildings in line with human scale, smooth transitions between private and public spaces, shared outdoor spaces, available green areas, shared indoor spaces, service facilities, household diversity, regional characteristics of the community and architectural details, etc. Through this method, the paper not only focuses on the architectural design itself, but also deeply explores the importance of the participatory design process for creating a social residential environment. This provides valuable insights into understanding how to promote community building and social interaction through architectural design.