Abstract:Securing adequate capital is an ongoing challenge for small and medium-sized family businesses (SMFBS). However, most theoretical and empirical studies of capital structure focus on public corporations. Propositions relating to profits maximization and assumptions of perfect information and rational economic behavior have limited the validity of these theories, casting some doubt on their ability to explain capital structure decisions in SMFBS. An alternative approach propose that, in raising finance, managers follow a pecking order in which internal funds are preferred, followed by debt, hybrid securities, and then, as a last resort, a new issue of ordinary share. The new pecking order theory does not rely on the existence of a target debt-equity ratio and seems to explain the actual financing behavior of SMFBS because they are believed to be more adverse to risk and loss of control.According to the new pecking order theory, considerable studies have been conducted on the financing behavior of SMFBS. First, experimental studies show that SMFBS obtain most of their capital by internal finance. Moreover, plenty of household resources flow into businesses because of the intermingling of family and business finance in SMFBS. The household-to-business intermingling creates less constructive behaviors and leads to decisions that are good in short run but not for long-run sustainability. Although family sources may play a critical role during the very early stages of the business, external sources became increasingly important as the business grew and matured. Second, debt financing is the major sources of external funds for SMFBS. SMFB’s owner-managers are believed to act to reduce risk exposure by maintaining lower debt levels, but this opinion is not always supported by empirical evidence. Some studies provide evidence that, thanks to personal and well-informed relationships with banks and other parties, SMFBS enjoy greater availability and lower cost of credit than non-family business. On the contrary, some studies indicate that there are virtually no differences between them in the usage of various credit products. Therefore, researchers have to resort to other approaches such as the financial growth circle theory to explain this controversy. Third, compared with non-family businesses, the equity route of SMFBS is proved to follow the linear process of dilution as supposed by the classical financial theory because of risk factors and beliefs that advantages of stock exchange listing outweigh its advantages. When compared with their non-family counterparts, SMFBS are less likely to use venture capital for the fear of dilution of control and loss of management freedom. Also, some SMFBS in certain countries have gone public and competed successfully with non-family business on the new market. Ownership concentration is positively evaluated by investors on this market, thus family interest and business interest are balanced in a long-term strategy which is simultaneously in favor of family control and entry of external investment.Plenty of researches have identified that SMFB owner’s personal characteristic and preference are of significant influence in capital structure decisions. Therefore, future research should attempt to develop empirically-based models that show relationships between those factors and SMFB owner-manager’s financing decisions. In addition, it would be helpful to employ dynamic analysis to explain the dynamic change of SMFB’S financing behavior. Last but not least, future research might seek to find out what competitive advantages or disadvantages the ″special financial logic″ of SMFB financing lead to and thus provide support for decision-making of owner-managers and policy-makers.

Investment Cash Flow Sensitivity under Behavioural Corporate Finance: A Literature Review via the Classification Scheme

Investment Cash Flow Sensitivity and Managerial Optimism: A Literature Review Via the Classification Scheme Technique

Investment Cash Flow Sensitivities Really Reflect Related Investment Decisions

Cognitive Antecedents of Family Business Bias in Investment Decisions: A Commentary on “risky Decisions and the Family Firm Bias: an Experimental Study Based on Prospect Theory”

Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivities, Credit Rationing and Financing Constraints

Do Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivities Measure Financial Constraints? New Evidence from Unpacking the Black Box

A Survey of Studies on Small and Medium-sized Family Business Financing

Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivities: Evidence from China Listed Real Estate Operating Companies

Corporate Investment Decision: A Review of Literature

Measuring Financing Constraints Using Firm-Level Estimation of Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivities: A Bayesian Approach

Unravelling Behavioural Biases in Individual and Institutional Investors Investment Decision- making: Intersection of Bibliometric and Systematic Literature Review

Information Production, Cash Flow and Corporate Investment

Moral Hazard and Investment-Cash-Flow Sensitivity

Review paper on impact of behavioral biases in financial decision- making

Financing Constraints and Corporate Investment

Causes and Consequences of Cash Flow Sensitivity: Empirical Tests of the U.S. Lodging Industry

A comprehensive review of behavioral biases in financial decision-making: from classical finance to behavioral finance perspectives

Corporate Culture and Investment–Cash Flow Sensitivity

The role of cognitive heuristic-driven biases in investment management activities and market efficiency: a research synthesis

Investment-internal capital sensitivity, investment-cash flow sensitivity and dividend payment

Financial Liberalization and the Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivity