Abstract:The relationship between investment and cash flow has been a subject of considerable empirical debate. In this paper, our aim is to shed a new light on this relationship. It is argued that a firm’s observed investment and financing decisions are endogenous, in an ex-post behavioral sense, and that, therefore, investment-cash flow sensitivity (when estimated in a reduced-form, linear investment equation) is likely to be an ambiguous, and possibly misleading, measure of (current and expected future) financial constraints. Empirical evidence is provided in support of our case, based on a two-stage estimation strategy. In the first stage, allowance is made for unobserved firm heterogeneity as related to cash flow; we generalize the Q-investment equation and estimate individual, firm-specific investment-cash flow sensitivities by applying an entropy-based fixed-effect estimator. In the second stage, we look inside the black box and investigate how and to what extent these sensitivities are “driven” by important underlying factors. A number of striking ceteris-paribus results emerge: a) investment-cash flow sensitivity is monotonically decreasing in the level of cash flow; b) cutting back on investment, hoarding more cash, taking less on debt, building up debt capacity, and paying low or zero dividends (actions that are typically associated with the presence of tighter financial constraints) tend to produce a smaller value of investment-cash flow sensitivity; c) investment-cash flow sensitivity is negatively related to cash-flow volatility and positively related to investment volatility; and d) firm size and asset tangibility do not contribute to explaining the variation in investment-cash flow sensitivities across firms. From these results, it follows that the relation between the investment-cash flow sensitivity’s magnitude and the degree of financial constraints is indeterminate a priori. While such results call into question conventional wisdom, they help to explain the many contradictory findings encountered in the literature.

Causes and Consequences of Cash Flow Sensitivity: Empirical Tests of the U.S. Lodging Industry

Measuring The Management Of Cash Flows From Operating Activities-Evidence From Chinese Capital Markets

Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivities: Evidence from China Listed Real Estate Operating Companies

Trust and Corporate Cash Holdings

Cash management in the travel and leisure sector: evidence from the United Kingdom

Investment Cash Flow Sensitivity and Managerial Optimism: A Literature Review Via the Classification Scheme Technique

Financial Liberalization and the Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivity

Do Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivities Measure Financial Constraints? New Evidence from Unpacking the Black Box

Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivities, Credit Rationing and Financing Constraints

Disappearing Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivities: Earnings Have Not Become a Worse Proxy for Cash Flow

Cash Flow Management, Incentives, and Market Pricing

Do financial constraints affect the sensitivity of investment to cash flow? New evidence from franchised restaurant firms

Investment Cash Flow Sensitivity under Behavioural Corporate Finance: A Literature Review via the Classification Scheme

Corporate Cash Reserves and Corporate Governance Mechanism: the Empirical Study of the Chinese Publicly Traded Corporations

Investment Cash Flow Sensitivities Really Reflect Related Investment Decisions

Managerial Cash Compensation, Government Control and Leverage Choice: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms

Balancing short-term gains and long-term success in lodging: The role of customer satisfaction and price in hotel profitability model

Real Estate Risk, Corporate Investment and Financing Choice

Does Cultural Difference Affect Investment–Cash Flow Sensitivity? Evidence from OECD Countries

Moral Hazard and Investment-Cash-Flow Sensitivity

Why is asset-light strategy necessary? An empirical analysis through the lens of cost stickiness