Abstract:Medical Decision Making, Ahead of Print. IntroductionInformation disclosures are used in medicine to provide patients with relevant information. This research examines whether patients are less likely to discuss medical conditions with their physicians after seeing an insurance information disclosure.MethodsThree experimental studies with nonprobability online samples (ntotal = 875 US adult participants) examined the impact of information disclosures on patients' likelihood of disclosing symptoms to providers, using new symptoms and preexisting chronic conditions. The effects of insurance disclosures were also compared to those of pharmaceutical discount disclosures.ResultsThese studies demonstrate that information disclosures can result in unintended consequences for patients and providers. Results showed that information disclosures about insurance claims significantly negatively affected willingness to discuss health information with providers. This effect was consistent for both new health concerns, b = −0.661, P < 0.001 (study 1, n = 250) and b = −0.893, P < 0.001 (study 3, n = 375), as well as chronic conditions, b = −1.175, P < .001 (study 2, n = 250); all studies were conducted in January 2023. Information provided to patients about pharmaceutical savings did not similarly affect willingness to discuss symptoms with providers.LimitationsThese were experimental studies with hypothetical scenarios. Future research is needed to understand how patients react to information disclosures in a physician's office. Future research is also needed to examine the role of specific wording and tone used in information disclosures.ConclusionsPrior research has shown that patients prefer more information and to be involved in their medical decisions; however, these studies demonstrate that some information disclosures can discourage full communication between patients and physicians.ImplicationsThis research has important implications for the potential consequences of information disclosures in health care settings. Information disclosures should be presented in a way that will not discourage candid discussions of patient symptoms.HighlightsThis research found that information disclosures about insurance claims can negatively affect patient willingness to discuss health information with providers.Information disclosures may sometimes fall short of their intended purpose of aiding patient decisions with the goal of improved well-being.When information disclosures are focused on warning about potential new costs, patients may feel uncomfortable discussing new symptoms with their providers.Findings suggest patients may often be more concerned with costs than with addressing their ongoing health problems.

Eliciting Risk Perceptions: Does Conditional Question Wording Have a Downside?

Associations among Risk Perception, Health Efficacy, and Health Behaviors for Cardiovascular Disease: an Application of Risk Perception Attitude Framework.

Causes and consequences of uncertainty about illness risk perceptions

Rain on the Parade of Influenza Vaccine Hesitancy

Perceptions of COVID-19 Risk: How Did People Adapt to the Novel Risk?

Varying risk comparison elements: effects on public reactions

Is the "avoidance" group truly defensive? The interplay between perceived risk, efficacy, and behaviors

Does perceived risk influence the effects of message framing? Revisiting the link between prospect theory and message framing

How Does Patient Provider Communication Affect Patients' Risk Perception? A Scenario Experiment and an Exploratory Investigation.

Using Separate Single-Outcome Risk Presentations Instead of Integrated Multioutcome Formats Improves Comprehension in Discrete Choice Experiments

Influence of Cardiovascular Risk Communication Tools and Presentation Formats on Patient Perceptions and Preferences

Factors influencing risk perception during Public Health Emergencies of International Concern (PHEIC): a scoping review

Common measures of vaccination intention generate substantially different estimates that can reduce predictive validity

Contrasting Objective and Perceived Risk: Predicting COVID-19 Health Behaviors in a Nationally Representative U.S. Sample

You won’t regret it (or love it) as much as you think: impact biases for everyday health behavior outcomes

Selective Exposure to COVID-19 Vaccination Information: the Influence of Prior Attitude, Perceived Threat Level and Information Limit

Lay views on uncertainty in environmental health risk assessment

The Relative Importance of the Contrast and Assimilation Effects in Decisions Under Risk

How Much Information Is Too Much? An Experimental Examination of How Information Disclosures May Unintentionally Encourage the Withholding of Health Information

Mismatch between self-perceived and calculated cardiometabolic disease risk among participants in a prevention program for cardiometabolic disease: a cross-sectional study

Post Hoc Bias in Treatment Decisions