Adequate surgical margins for oral cancer: A Taiwan cancer registry national database analysis

Mei-Chun Lin,Yi-Shing Leu,Chun-Ju Chiang,Jenq-Yuh Ko,Cheng-Ping Wang,Tsung-Lin Yang,Tseng-Cheng Chen,Chun-Nan Chen,Hsin-Lin Chen,Chun-Ta Liao,Sen-Tien Tsai,Jin-Ching Lin,Pen-Yuan Chu,Kuo-Yang Tsai,Ming-Hsui Tsai,Huai-Cheng Huang,Muh-Hwa Yang,Yuan-Hua Wu,Shyuang-Der Terng,Chih-Yen Chien,Tsang-Wu Liu,Wen-Chung Lee,Pei-Jen Lou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2021.105358
IF: 5.972
2021-08-01
Oral Oncology
Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Background</h3><p>Margin status and lymph node metastasis are the most important prognostic factors for oral cancers. However, while adequate surgical resection is crucial for local control and prognosis, the definition of clear margins has long been a subject of debate. In this study, we analyzed data from a nationwide population-based cancer registry database and evaluated the impact of surgical margins on cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) as well as the optimal cutoff of adequate surgical margins.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Methods</h3><p>This analysis included all cases of oral cancer diagnosed from 2011 to 2017 that were reported to the Taiwan Cancer Registry database. The staging system was converted from American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) version 7 to AJCC version 8. Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox proportional-hazards regression were performed to identify covariates that were significantly associated with CSS and OS.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>Between 2011 and 2017, 15,654 of a total of 36,091 cases diagnosed with oral cancers were included in the final analyses. Advanced N stage, positive margins, and advanced T stage are the leading risk factors for poor CSS and OS. When surgical margins were subdivided into 1-mm intervals from 5 mm to positive margin, we found that surgical margins &lt;4 mm and &lt;5 mm predict poor CSS and OS, respectively.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusions</h3><p>This is the first nationwide, population-based cohort to revisit the question of the adequate surgical margins for oral cancers. We conclude that surgical margins ≥4 mm and ≥5 mm are adequate for good CSS and OS, respectively.</p>
dentistry, oral surgery & medicine,oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?