Abstract:IMPORTANCE Resection of the primary tumor with negative margins is the gold standard treatment for squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue (SCCOT). A microscopically positive surgical margin is clearly associated with a higher risk for local recurrence, whereas a negative margin has traditionally been defined as greater than 5.0 mm clearance from the tumor, with lesser margins arbitrarily designated as close. The precise cutoff at which the risk for local recurrence with a close margin approximates that of a microscopically positive margin remains unclear.OBJECTIVE To determine whether the arbitrarily defined close margin (< 5.0 mm) would portend as high a risk for local recurrence as a positive margin after resection of SCCOT.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this retrospective study, head and neck pathologists reviewed archived tumor specimens from 381 patients with SCCOT who underwent primary surgical resection at a tertiary care center from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2012. Data were analyzed from November 15, 2015, to January 5, 2016. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used in patients who did not have a microscopically positive margin to determine an optimal margin cutoff for local recurrence-free survival (LRFS). Pathologic factors were assessed for LRFS in a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary end point was evaluation of the margin distance associated with LRFS. RESULTS Among the 381 patients included in the analysis (222 men [58.3%] and 159 women [41.7%]; mean [SD] age, 58 [14.7] years), the optimal cutoff associated with LRFS was determined to be 2.2 mm. This cutoff was compared with the traditionally accepted cutoff of 5.0 mm. Patients with a margin of 2.3 to 5.0 mm had similar LRFS as patients with a margin of greater than 5.0 mm(hazard ratio [HR], 1.31; 95% CI, 0.58-2.96), and all other comparisons were significantly different (HR for positive margin, 9.03; 95% CI, 3.45-23.67; HR for 0.01- to 2.2-mm margin, 2.83; 95% CI, 1.32-6.07). Based on this result, negative margins were redefined as those with a clearance of greater than 2.2 mm. In a multivariate model adjusting for pathologic factors, positive margins (adjusted HR, 5.73; 95% CI, 2.45-13.41) and margins of 0.01 to 2.2 mm (adjusted HR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.13-3.55) were the variables most significantly associated with LRFS.CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this study, local recurrence-free survival was significantly affected only with surgical margins of less than or equal to 2.2 mm in patients with SCCOT. This new definition of close margins stratifies the risk for local recurrence better than the arbitrary 5.0-mm cutoff that has been used.

Should sub-millimeter margins be deemed positive in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma?

Optimizing margin status for improving prognosis in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective study from the two highest-volume Taiwanese hospitals

Surgical margins status and prognosis after resection of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: results from a Taiwanese nationwide registry-based study

Are all high-volume surgeons equally good outcome? A survival analysis of patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma in relation to surgical margin status based on …

Prognostic Improvement of Reexcision for Positive Resection Margins in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer.

A Proposal to Redefine Close Surgical Margins in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Tongue

Adequate surgical margins for oral cancer: A Taiwan cancer registry national database analysis

Margin-to-depth ratio as an independent prognostic factor in resected oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: A nationwide cohort study

Priority of Adjuvant Radiation Therapy in Patients with Oral Cavity Cancer and Close Margins? Impact of Invasive Tumor Depth

The Influence of Mild Dysplasia at the Surgical Margin on the Prognosis of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Margin to depth of invasion ratio as an indicator for stratifying close margins in early-stage oral squamous cell carcinoma

Initial negative resection margin versus revised negative resection margin in patients who underwent surgery without adjuvant therapy for early-stage oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma

Incidence, Predictors and Prognostic Implications of Positive Circumferential Resection Margin in Colon Cancer: A Retrospective Study in a Chinese High-Volume Cancer Center.

cN+ pN0 disease does not portend a less favorable prognosis compared with cN0pN0 in patients with resected oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma

Comparing the clinical outcomes of initial surgery and primary definitive radiotherapy with a dosage of 6600 cGy or higher in cT1−2N0M0 oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: A nationwide cohort study

Clinical Outcomes of Taiwanese Patients with Resected Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma Who Underwent Reconstruction with Free Versus Local Flaps

Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Impact of Clear Margin Distance on Locoregional Control in Patients Undergoing Postoperative Radiotherapy

Impact of Close Margins on Oral Cancer Outcomes According to the Oral Subsite

Prognosis of tongue squamous cell carcinoma associated with individual surgical margin and pathological features

The Prognostic Value of Varying Definitions of Positive Resection Margin in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases

Prognostic implications of mucosal and deep margin distances according to T‐status in oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma: A single‐center retrospective study