Abstract:I. Romantic Lyric THE DEFINITION OF "ROMANTICISM" MAY BE (LIKE ALL--ISMS) A MATTER of great debate, but little of that debate has had much to do with American poetry. When in 1924 Arthur O. Lovejoy proposed abandoning the term as a literary historical frame, complaining that "the word 'romantic' has come to mean so many things that, by itself, it means nothing," nineteenth-century American poetry was not one of those too many things. (1) When Rene Wellek responded to Lovejoy in 1949 by arguing that one must conceive of period terms "not as arbitrary linguistic labels nor as metaphysical entities, but as names for systems of norms which dominate literature at a specific time of the historical process," the norms that dominated American poetry in the nineteenth century were not one of the systems he had in mind. (2) When these founders of the history of ideas and of modern comparative literary study talked about Romanticism, it is safe to assume that they meant European Romanticism, and when Anglo-American literary critics today continue to talk about Romanticism--or when the upper case noun becomes a lower case adjective (as in, "the romantic novel," or, most often, "romantic poetry"), or even when it is shortened to Northrop Frye's stenographer's shorthand, "Rcsm," which as Anahid Nersessian has recently reminded us, was Frye's unpublished vision of a Romanticism neither too capacious nor too normative, "a low adjustment utopia"--it is safe to assume that the term refers to the history of ideas that stretched from mid eighteenth--and nineteenth-century German idealism through late eighteenth--and nineteenth-century European national revolutions (especially the French) and that found a literary home in British poetics. (3) In departments of English, we know that when we talk about Romantic Poetry we don't just mean Blake and Wordsworth and Coleridge and Keats and Shelley and Byron but also Hemans and Scott and Smith and Barbauld and Baillie and Bums and Clare and the list goes on--or at least the list of British, Irish, and Scots poets continues to expand. Romanticists themselves may admit that their original canon was framed by a Paris editor and swiftly republished in Philadephia (and so, as Meredith McGill points out, was transatlantic from the start), or that expressive poetics actually derived from the Orientalist Sir William Jones's Sanskrit and Persian translations (and so, as Aamir Mufti points out, was Orientalized from the start), or that the historical coincidence of the emergence of Romanticism and the middle of the Middle Passage was no coincidence (and so, as Edouard Glissant and many others have pointed out, was invested in the emergence of the worst forms of modernity from the start), but those admissions have not made much difference in the way we tell the story of Romanticism and almost no difference in the way we conduct the business of the profession of literary studies. (4) When we do speak of American Romanticism, we tend to mean Transcendentalism, and by Transcendentalism, we tend to mean Emerson and the writers in conversation with his heady mixture of German philosophy, British poetics, and American pragmatism: Fuller, Douglass, Thoreau, Hawthorne, Melville, Whitman, Dickinson, and, as the ever perverse exception: Poe. This is to say that just as "Romanticism" can still dependably refer to a small canon of late eighteenth--and early nineteenth-century British poets, "American Romanticism" can be counted on to mean what continues to be taught as the canon of nineteenth-century American literature, which, as Maurice Lee has recently shown, remains (like British Romanticism) stubbornly canonical. (5) Though most scholars know that (as the great new Teaching Transatlanticism project launched by Linda Hughes and Sarah Robbins attests) the old Transcendentalist, mostly white Anglo-American canons are passe, that they mask all sorts of exchange by and through many writers and readers who occupied a much wider and more complex version of the Atlantic World than those canons represent, the canons themselves don't reflect that knowledge. …

American Romanticism, Again

Ecology and Imagination: Emerson, Thoreau, And The Nature Of Metonymy

The Ecological Consciousness of Natural Writing in British and American Romantic Literature

A Critical Survey of the Literary Sense in American Renaissance

Victorianism and Contemporary Literature

Romantic Period Laboring-Class Poetry

Wordsworth, Lyrical Ballads, and the Problem of Peasant Poetry

The Verdant Canvas: An Investigation into the Significance of Nature in Romantic Poetry

Understanding American Historical Change through Cultural Traditions, Physical Environment, & Literature: A Comparative Reflection in Global Community

Chinese Thought and Transcendentalism: Ecology, Place and Conservative Radicalism

American Transcendentalism and the Twenty-First Century

Is Li Bai a romanticist? —Understanding an old poet through a new concept

Wordsworth, Coleridge, and the "Plan" of the Lyrical Ballads

The Nostalgic Imagination

Nature as a Spiritual and Moral Guide: Analysing the Romantic Ideals in Wordsworths Lyrical Ballads

Bodies in Late Romanticism: Two Perspectives

A Study of Myth and Religious Colors in British and American Literature

William Wordsworth’s Theoretical Contribution to Canon of Literary Criticism in Light of Preface to Lyrical Ballads

Journey to Love: William Carlos Williams in the Pacific Northwest

Kate Chopin’s prose in the context of American transcendentalism

Thoughts on American Puritanism and Puritan Literature