Differences of English and Chinese As Written Languages and Strategies in English Writing Teaching
Ying Wang,Jing Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.4.647-652
2013-01-01
Theory and Practice in Language Studies
Abstract:The size of both the United States and China guarantees that many people will communicate in English and Chinese.But those two common languages do not guarantee perfect communication in writing practice for several reasons.This paper explores the factors resulting in non-understandable communication of English and Chinese as written language, and some strategies applied by English teachers when training students' English writing. Index Terms-differences, English, Chinese, written language, strategiesNo one knows exactly how many languages are used in today's world.According to one estimate, there are about 3,000 to 4,000 spoken languages.Each differs in sound, grammar, and sentence construction as well as writing style.English and Chinese, which are the most commonly used languages in the world have some factors that influence a good understanding in oral and written communication both in and between these two languages.Especially in business writing, there are some differences in writing style that attract our attention. I. DIFFERENCES BETWEEN ENGLISH AND CHINESE THINKING MODEThe thinking patterns are one of the most important cues in culture.It is closely related to cultures and embodies the characteristics of cultural psychology."The ways of thinking is quite different, actually, people live in certain area have their own way of thinking.It connects to various kinds of factors, such as geography, history, nation and so on.The ways of thinking are the important reason of cultural difference.It includes knowledge, concepts, methods, language and custom and so on."(DengYanchang, 1997) Besides, the modes of thinking also are closely related to language.Different modes of thinking are embodied in language.Therefore, the ways of thinking have their own characteristics.The differences of the thinking patterns between Chinese and English nations can be approached and considered from various viewpoints.Here are but a few instances for illustration. A. Visual Thinking VS Rational ThinkingThe visualized thinking mode, or empirical synthesizes thinking pattern as Zheng Yanhong (Zheng Yanhong, 2003 ) puts it, establishes the essential difference between the Chinese and the English nation who favors the rational analytic thinking modes.The Chinese is perceptual in their comprehensive thought, but the English and other Western nations may have developed their own rational and analytic thinking modes.The doctrine of "yin and yang as one" in the Chinese philosophy, not denying the opposition though, lays greater emphasis on the aspect of unity.But the separation of God and human in the English and the Westerners philosophy stresses the opposition aspect though not obviously denying the unity.Such difference has been typical of the two different thinking modes.The Chinese stresses the whole and abstract, and the Westerners stress the components and the specific; the Chinese favors synthesis, while the westerners analysis.For instance, when talking about time, the Chinese always start from general units and move on to smaller units, but the English is opposite; and this is also true of their expression of locations.Even in their acquaintance introduction, the Chinese would list the titles (whole) first (from the higher to the lower) before referring to the specific names (individual), but the English would announce the specific name first (individual), then list a succession of duties from the lower to the higher. B. Generalizing Thinking VS Analytical ThinkingThe Chinese people are concerned more with their own bodies in expressing emotions, so intuition thinking is the main feature of their mode of thought, for which people study objects as a whole and emphasize entirety.Chinese philosophy is systematical naturalism.(Mao Ronggui, 2002) In the English thinking pattern, individualism is greatly emphasized.The English people link their own emotion to planetary influence and the natural elements, so they prefer analytical logic thinking.Target objects are subordinated into small parts in order to be scrutinized, which, of course, may lead them to place the components before the whole when they try to know something.