Abstract:Based on publications indexed in the Web of Science, the current study focused on internationally collaborated publications and publications acknowledging government funding of developing and developed countries including China, the US, Germany, the Netherlands, South Africa, and Brazil. Specific focus is placed on national funding agencies (i.e., focal agencies) supporting competitive research in science. The focal agencies of the six countries include the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), the US National Science Foundation (NSF), German Research Foundation, the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO), National Research Foundation of South Africa (NRF), and National Council for Scientific and Technological Development of Brazil (CNPq). Results show that different countries vary in arrangement of government funding sources in support of competitive research projects. China and Brazil are centralized to the NSFC and CNPq, whereas the remaining four countries have relatively decentralized sources. The six focal national funding agencies of the current study are more efficient than non-focal agencies in raising citation impact, with the NWO, NSF, and NSFC perform better than non-focal agencies of corresponding countries. International collaboration improves citation impact, with the developing countries benefit more. Authorship (first or corresponding authorship) also plays a role in international collaboration. Collaboration led by authors from developed countries has a positive effect whereas that led by authors from developing countries usually have negative effects on citation impact. Interaction between funding and collaboration may have results different from those when these two factors are considered separately, which suggests being cautious while discussing effects of either of the two factors.

The normalization of co-authorship networks in the bibliometric evaluation: the government stimulation programs of China and Korea

Modeling Scholarly Collaboration and Temporal Dynamics in Citation Networks for Impact Prediction

Has Globalization Strengthened South Korea’s National Research System? National and International Dynamics of the Triple Helix of Scientific Co-Authorship Relationships in South Korea

How to Evaluate Universities in Terms of Their Relative Citation Impacts: Fractional Counting of Citations and the Normalization of Differences among Disciplines

Longitudinal Trends in Networks of University-Industry-Government Relations in South Korea: The Role of Programmatic Incentives

An In-Depth Analysis of Government Funding and International Collaboration in Scientific Research

A Bibliometric Perspective on the Roles of Government Funding and International Collaboration in Scientific Research.

Korean journals in the Science Citation Index: What do they reveal about the intellectual structure of S&T in Korea?

The Bibliometrics Analysis of International Co-authorship in Chinese Library and Information Science

Patterns and Evolution of Coauthorship in China’s Humanities and Social Sciences

A Comparative Study of Domestic and Cross‐country Impact of Chinese and U.S. Publications in Chemistry

The Role of Positive and Negative Citations in Scientific Evaluation

International Co-authorship Relations in the Social Science Citation Index: Is Internationalization Leading the Network?

Elevating International Collaboration and Academic Outcomes Through Strategic Research Funding: a Bibliometric Analysis of China Scholarship Council Funded Publications

Comparative Study Based on the Collaborative Fund Publications in Physics of China Published in CNKI and WoS

Full and Fractional Counting in Bibliometric Networks

International Coauthorship Relations in the Social Sciences Citation Index: is Internationalization Leading the Network?

Patterns and Impact of Collaboration in China’s Social Sciences: Cross-Database Comparisons Between CSSCI and SSCI

The Effect Of Co-Authorship Network On Research Performance Of Scholars: A Correlation Analysis

Fractional counting of citations in research evaluation: An option for cross- and interdisciplinary assessments

The Relative Influences of Government Funding and International Collaboration on Citation Impact