Adherence to an energy‐restricted Mediterranean diet is associated with the presence and burden of carotid atherosclerosis in people with type 1 diabetes

Tonet Serés‐Noriega,Clara Viñals,Verónica Perea,Alex Mesa,Laura Boswell,Karla Mariaca,Jesús Blanco,Irene Vinagre,Adriana Pané,Camila Milad,Clara Solà,Enric Esmatjes,Ignacio Conget,Marga Giménez,Antonio J. Amor
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.3783
2024-02-27
Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews
Abstract:Cardiovascular benefit evidence of the Mediterranean diet in people with type 1 diabetes (T1D) is scarce. We analyzed the relationships between adherence to the energy‐restricted Mediterranean diet (erMEDd) and carotid atherosclerosis determined by ultrasonography in subjects with T1D without cardiovascular disease. We included 401 patients. Those with atherosclerosis showed lower adherence to the erMEDd, fruit and nut consumption and lower preference for white over red meat. Greater adherence to the erMEDd was correlated with an overall better metabolic profile. In adjusted models, adherence to the erMEDd, fruit and nut consumption were independently associated with lower carotid atherosclerosis. Aims People with type 1 diabetes (T1D) have an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). The Mediterranean diet is associated with reduced CVD; however, the evidence in T1D is scarce. We aimed to analyse the relationships between adherence to the energy‐restricted Mediterranean diet (erMEDd) and carotid atherosclerosis. Materials and Methods We included children with T1D without CVD, with ≥1 of the following: age ≥40 years, diabetic kidney disease, or ≥10 years of disease duration with another risk factor. Plaque presence (intima‐media thickness ≥1.5 mm) was determined by ultrasonography. The PREDIMED‐Plus 17‐item questionnaire (PP‐17) was used to assess adherence to the erMEDd. Results Four hundred one individuals were included (48% males, age 48.3 ± 11 years, diabetes duration 26.8 ± 11.4 years). Those harbouring plaques (42%) showed lower adherence to the erMEDd (PP‐17: 8.9 ± 2.3 of a maximum of 17 vs. 9.8 ± 2.5, p
endocrinology & metabolism
What problem does this paper attempt to address?