Maintenance Electroconvulsive Therapy: Cost-effectiveness and Patient/Family Satisfaction.

R. Rodríguez-Jiménez,A. Bagney,I. Torio,M. Caballero,P. Ruiz,F. P. Rivas-Clemente,M. Jiménez‐Arriero,G. Petrides
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/YCT.0000000000000249
2015-12-01
Journal of Ect
Abstract:To the Editor: D ifferent studies have shownmaintenance electroconvulsive therapy (m-ECT) to be a safe and effective therapy for the treatment of affective disorders, with m-ECT alone showing similar efficacy to pharmacotherapy alone, and the combination of m-ECT and pharmacotherapy being superior to either of the 2 treatments on its own. The literature also suggests that the combination of m-ECT and antipsychotic drugs is superior to antipsychotics alone in the treatment of schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Despite its clinical efficacy, the use of m-ECT is not as extended as might be expected. One of the factors that may contribute to the underuse of m-ECT is the need for specific resources for its administration (hospital setting, operating room, anesthesiologists, psychiatrists, nurses...). This means that cost-effectiveness studies are needed in this area; however, there are very few researches on the cost-effectiveness of m-ECT. Bonds et al reported the case of a patient with refractory bipolar I disorder who responded to ECT. The authors compared the cost of m-ECTwith the costs associated with treatment before his inclusion in the m-ECT program. In this patient, m-ECT reduced the cost of bipolar depression bymore than 50%, mostly because of a decreased need for acute hospitalizations. McDonald et al compared 12-month outcomes in 6 elderly patients with depression receivingmaintenance pharmacotherapy
What problem does this paper attempt to address?