The diagnostic utility of obtaining two blood cultures for the diagnosis of early onset sepsis in neonates

Noa Fleiss,Veronika Shabanova,Thomas S. Murray,Patrick G. Gallagher,Matthew J. Bizzarro
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-024-01914-6
2024-02-27
Journal of Perinatology
Abstract:A positive blood culture is the gold standard for diagnosing neonatal sepsis [1, 2]. Several factors may affect blood culture reliability, including blood volume obtained, bacterial colony counts, sterile technique, antibiotic exposure, laboratory techniques and culture media, and number of sites cultured [1,2,3,4]. The practice of obtaining two blood cultures from different sites in neonates is common when evaluating for late-onset sepsis (LOS) as a means of potentially increasing yield and differentiating true infection from contamination or line colonization [5]. While this practice has been widely adapted for LOS, limited data exist on its utility for early-onset sepsis (EOS) [5, 6]. The 2018 American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines for EOS state that "use of two separate culture bottles may help determine if commensal species are true infections by comparing growth in two cultures [2]." At the Yale New Haven Children's Hospital Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), the practice of obtaining two separate site blood cultures when evaluating for suspected EOS was adopted for this purpose as well as to increase the likelihood of organism recovery. This study examines the utility of a two-blood culture approach in the evaluation for EOS over a 9-year period.
pediatrics,obstetrics & gynecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?