Efficacy of three insect repellents against the malaria vector Anopheles arabiensis

J. Govere,D. N. Durrheim,L. Baker,R. Hunt,Maureen Coetzee
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2915.2000.00261.x
2000-12-01
Medical and Veterinary Entomology
Abstract:Three commercial repellents marketed in South Africa: Bio‐SkincareTM (BSC, oils of coconut, jojoba, rapeseed and vitamin E), MosiguardTM towelletes with 0.574 g quwenling (p‐menthane‐3,8‐diol, PMD) and the standard deet (15% diethyl‐3‐methylbenzamide, TabardTM lotion), were compared against a laboratory colony of the mosquito Anopheles arabiensis Patton (Diptera: Culicidae), the predominant malaria vector in South Africa. Human forearms were treated with 1.2 g BSC, 0.8 g PMD towelette or 0.5 g deet and exposed to 200 hungry An. arabiensis females for 1 min, at intervals of 1–6 h post‐treatment. Tests were conducted by three adult male volunteers (aged 30–45 years, crossover controlled test design for 3 consecutive days), using their left arm for treatment and right arm for untreated control. Biting rates averaged 39–52 bites/min on untreated arms. All three repellents provided complete protection against An. arabiensis for up to 3–4 h post‐application; deet and PMD gave 90–100% protection up to 5–6 h, but BSC declined to only 52% protection 6 h post‐treatment. These results are interpreted to show that all three repellent products give satisfactory levels of personal protection against An. arabiensis for 4–5 h, justifying further evaluation in the field.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?