Comparison of a risk calculator with frailty indices in patients undergoing lung cancer resection

Dominic J. Vitello,Charles D. Logan,Norah N. Zaza,Kelly R. Bates,Ryan Jacobs,Joseph Feinglass,Ryan P. Merkow,David J. Bentrem
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27815
2024-09-02
Journal of Surgical Oncology
Abstract:Introduction Perioperative risk stratification is an essential component of preoperative planning for cancer surgery. While frailty has gained attention for its utility in risk stratification, no studies have directly compared it to existing risk calculators. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare the risk stratification of the American College of Surgeons Surgical Risk Calculator (ACS‐SRC), the Revised Risk Analysis Index (RAI‐rev), and the Modified Frailty Index (5‐mFI). The primary outcomes were 30‐day postoperative morbidity, 30‐day postoperative mortality, unplanned readmission, unplanned reoperation, and discharge disposition other‐than‐home. Methods Patients undergoing anatomic lung resection for primary, non‐small cell lung cancer were identified within the American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database. The ACS‐SRC, RAI‐rev, and 5‐mFI tools were used to predict adverse postoperative events. Tools were compared for discrimination in the primary outcomes. Results 9663 patients undergoing anatomic lung resection for cancer between 2012 and 2014 were included. The cohort was 53.1% female. Median age at diagnosis was 67 (interquartile range = 59–74) years. Cardiothoracic surgeons performed 89% and general surgeons performed 11.0% of the operations. Perioperative morbidity and mortality rates were 10.9% (n = 1048) and 1.6% (n = 158). Rates of 30‐day postoperative unplanned readmission and reoperation were 7.5% (n = 725) and 4.8% (n = 468). The ACS‐SRC had the highest discrimination for all measured outcomes, as measured by the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) and corresponding confidence interval (95% confidence interval [CI]). This included perioperative mortality (AUC = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.71–0.78), compared to RAI‐rev (AUC = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.62–0.69) and 5‐mFI (AUC = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.57–0.65; p
oncology,surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?