Comparison of a Risk Calculator With Frailty Indices in Patients Undergoing Lung Cancer Resection

Dominic J. Vitello,Charles D. Logan,Norah N. Zaza,Kelly R. Bates,Ryan Jacobs,Joseph Feinglass,Ryan P. Merkow,David J. Bentrem
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27861
2024-10-11
Journal of Surgical Oncology
Abstract:Introduction While frailty has gained attention for its utility in risk stratification, no studies have directly compared them to existing risk calculators. The objective of this study was to compare the risk stratification of the American College of Surgeons Surgical Risk Calculator (ACS‐SRC), the Revised Risk Analysis Index (RAI‐rev), and the Modified Frailty Index (5‐mFI). The primary outcomes were 30‐day postoperative morbidity, 30‐day postoperative mortality, unplanned readmission, unplanned reoperation, and discharge disposition other than home. Methods Patients undergoing anatomic lung resection for primary, nonsmall cell lung cancer were identified within the ACS National Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database. Tools were compared for discrimination in the primary outcomes. Results 9663 patients undergoing anatomic lung resection for cancer between 2012 and 2014 were included. The cohort was 53.1% female. Median age at diagnosis was 67 (IQR 59–74) years. Perioperative morbidity and mortality rates were 10.9% (n = 1048) and 1.6% (n = 158). Rates of 30‐day postoperative unplanned readmission and reoperation were 7.5% (n = 725) and 4.8% (n = 468). The ACS‐SRC had the highest discrimination for all measured outcomes, as measured by the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) and corresponding confidence interval (95% CI). This included perioperative mortality (AUC 0.74, 95% CI 0.71–0.78), compared to RAI‐rev (AUC 0.66, 95% CI 0.62–0.69) and 5‐mFI (AUC 0.61, 95% CI 0.57–0.65; p
oncology,surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?