2056779 Ultrasound Image Classification of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS) of the Breast -the Analysis of 705 DCIS Lesions / JABTS BC-02 Study-
Takanori Watanabe,Takuhiro Yamaguchi,Eisuke Fukuma,Hiroko Tsunoda,Koichi Hirokaga,Kumiko Tanaka,Ryuzo Sekiguchi,Ei Ueno,Hidemitsu Yasuda,Miki Yamaguchi,Toshitaka Okuno,Yoichi Ishibe,Etsuo Takada,Kanako Ban,Toshikazu Ito,Shuichi Nakatani,Masahiko Tsuruoka,Hiroko Kusuyama
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2014.12.232
IF: 3.694
2015-01-01
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
Abstract:DCIS can appear ultrasonographically as a wide variety of image types. The Japan Association of Breast and Thyroid Sonology (JABTS) classifies breast lesions primarily into masses and non-mass abnormalities on ultrasound (US). The JABTS further classifies non-mass abnormalities into the following five subtypes: abnormalities of the ducts, hypoechoic area in the mammary gland, architectural distortion, clustered microcysts, and echogenic foci without a hypoechoic area. However, the frequencies of distribution of these variations among DCIS lesions remains unclear. To clarify this distribution, we conducted a multicenter retrospective observational study (JABTS BC-02 study). Clinical data and US images of patients with DCIS who underwent surgery from January 2008 to December 2012 were collected from 15 institutions in Japan. Clinical data of DCIS patients were collected, even in cases in which US could not detect the DCIS lesion. US images were evaluated by the Centralized Image Interpretation Committee without clinical information. Clinical data from 809 DCIS lesions were collected, among which DCIS was detected by US in 705 (87%). These 705 ultrasonographically-detected DCIS lesions were classified as follows: 277 (39%) were masses, 57 (8%) were abnormalities of the ducts, 354 (50%) were hypoechoic areas in the mammary gland, 3 (0.4%) were clustered microcysts, 3 (0.4%) were architectural distortions, 10 (1.4%) were echogenic foci without a hypoechoic area, and 1 was impossible to classify (note: in 63 of the 705 lesions, two or more different types of images coexisted, and the dominant type was used in the classification). Of the 277 masses, 215 (78%) lesions were solid masses, while 62 (22%) were complex cystic and solid masses. Echogenic foci were seen in 271 of the 705 (38%) DCIS lesions. Echogenic foci were visible in 115 of 186 (62%) comedo-type DCIS lesions, and in 151 of 499 (30%) non-comedo DCIS lesions. In this study, 87% of DCIS lesions were detected by US. DCIS was recognized most frequently in US as a hypoechoic area in the mammary gland, while masses were the second most frequently detected type.