Abstract:Background The literature describes more than ten upper extremity physical performance tests that are characterized by being low-cost, quick, and easy to administer. However, there are discussions about the applicability of the tests in clinical practice due to their inability to reproduce the sports-specific movement and the lack of reference values. Objectives To evaluate the opinion of Brazilian sports physiotherapists regarding the frequency, timing, and difficulties in using upper extremity physical performance tests in clinical practice, as well as to investigate which of the tests available in the literature are being used more or less frequently. Methods The study design was cross-sectional. Physiotherapists working in the orthopedic or sports field were invited to fill out an online questionnaire. The frequency question was multiple choice, allowing participants to select one of five options ranging from never to always. The timing question was multiple choice, allowing participants to select all three options: assessment, rehabilitation, and return to sport. The question about difficulties was multiple choice, allowing participants to click on only one of the following options: “yes”, “a little”, or “no”. The first two options directed the participant to an optional open question to report the difficulties. As for the question regarding which test, they use, the names and figures of each of the ten tests were presented, and the participants answered whether or not they used them. The present study included the participation of physiotherapists who treated at least 1% of athletes per month, but for this abstract, the responses of physiotherapists for whom athlete treatment represented 50% or more of the services rendered per month were analyzed descriptively. Results The answers of one hundred sports physiotherapists were analyzed, the majority of whom were male (67%), worked in the state of São Paulo (32%), and had an average age of 33 years with 8 years of experience in the physiotherapy area. The physiotherapists answered that they frequently use the tests (37%), mainly for assessment purposes (85%), and the majority reported not having difficulty applying the tests (57%). The physiotherapists who reported having difficulty pointed out the lack of reference values, adequate space, evaluation time, and knowledge about the tests as a challenge in clinical practice, as well as the inability to reproduce the sports-specific movement and the lack of adaptation to different body types. The most commonly used test was the “Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test” (CKCUEST) (86%), while the least used was the “Upper Body Push and Pull Strength Ratio” (23%). Conclusion In conclusion, physiotherapists whose treatment of athletes represented 50% or more of the treatments per month, despite reporting some difficulties, frequently use upper extremity physical performance tests, mainly the CKCUEST, to evaluate their athletes. Implications This abstract showed that physiotherapists who treat athletes are aware of and use upper extremity physical performance tests, but some encounter difficulties in implementing them in clinical practice. Therefore, further research in this area may provide reference values for the Brazilian population.

CLINIMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THE BRIDGE TEST IN BED FOR HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS

The Bed Bridge Test: a new functional test for hospital inpatients – a feasibility and measurement study

Development of a Functional Bridge Test for Screening Impairments and Disabilities in Hemiplegic Patients with Acute Stroke while on the Bed

A comparison of two balance measures to predict discharge performance from inpatient stroke rehabilitation

The one-minute sit-to-stand test: A practical tool for assessing functional exercise capacity in patients with COPD in routine clinical practice

Computerized Adaptive Testing for the Berg Balance Scale Improves Measurement Efficiency Without Compromising Precision in People With Stroke

Semitendinosus and biceps femoris long head activity during the single leg bridge test in healthy individuals

Assessing the Reliability and Validity of a Physical Therapy Functional Measurement Tool--the Modified Iowa Level of Assistance Scale--in Acute Hospital Inpatients

Experimental Validation of an Upper Limb Benchmarking Framework in Healthy and Post-Stroke Individuals: A Pilot Study

Test-retest, intra- and inter-rater reliability of the reactive balance test in patients with chronic ankle instability

OPINIONS OF BRAZILIAN SPORTS PHYSIOTHERAPISTS ON UPPER EXTREMITY PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE TESTS

Development and psychometric properties of the Balance in Daily Life (BDL) scale in a population of frail older people

FUNCTIONAL CAPACITY AND DISABILITY IN OLDER ADULTS WITH CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN: A STUDY OF RESPONSIVENESS

Validity and reliability of automated treadmill six-minute walk test in patients entering exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation

Assessing Functional Capacity in Directly and Remotely Monitored Home-Based Settings in Individuals With Chronic Respiratory Diseases: Protocol for a Multinational Validation Study

Balance function in critical illness survivors and evaluation of psychometric properties of the Mini-BESTest

Concurrent Validation of the Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Patient Assessment Instrument Version 1.4; Sections GG, B, and C

Validity and reliability of the Six-Minute Pegboard Ring Test for assessing functional capacity and upper limb function in persons with multiple sclerosis

Acceptability and utility of a broad test battery to evaluate physical functioning and frailty in community-based settings for people experiencing homelessness and addiction-Findings from the LEAP trials.

Toward a Common Language for Measuring Patient Mobility in the Hospital: Reliability and Construct Validity of Interprofessional Mobility Measures

The decline in postural balance has a negative impact on the performance of functional tasks in individuals with Parkinson's Disease