Is all work the same? Performance after accumulated work of differing intensities in male professional cyclists
Manuel Mateo-March,Peter Leo,Xabier Muriel,Alejandro Javaloyes,Iñigo Mujika,David Barranco-Gil,Jesús G. Pallarés,Alejandro Lucia,Pedro L. Valenzuela
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2024.03.005
IF: 4.597
2024-03-28
Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
Abstract:Objectives Although the ability to attenuate power output (PO) declines after accumulated work (i.e., 'durability') is increasingly recognized as a major determinant of cycling performance, the potential role of the intensity of the previous work is unclear. We assessed the effect of work-matched levels of accumulated work at different intensities on performance in male professional cyclists. Design Observational field-based study. Methods PO data was registered in 17 cyclists during a competition season, and the critical power (CP) was repeatedly determined every 4wks from training sessions and competitions. Participants' maximum mean power (MMP) for different durations (5 s, 5 min, 10 min, and 20 min) and the CP were determined under 'fresh' conditions (0 kJ·kg −1 ) and after varying levels of accumulated work (2.5, 5.0 and 7.5 kJ·kg −1 ) at intensities below and above the CP. Results A significant decline was found for all MMP values following all levels of accumulated work above the CP (− 4.0 %, − 1.7 %, − 1.8 %, and − 3.2 % for 30s, 5 min, 10 min and 20 min-MMP, respectively; all p 0.05). Similar results were observed for the CP, which decreased after all levels of accumulated work above (− 2.2 %, − 6.1 %, and − 16.2 %, after 2.5, 5.0 and 7.5 kJ·kg −1 , p 0.05). Conclusions In male professional cyclists, accumulated work above the CP impairs performance compared with work-matched, albeit less intense efforts. This raises concerns on the use of mechanical work per se as a single fatigue/stress indicator in these athletes.
sport sciences