EVALUATING THE PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF DIFFERENT BLOOD PRESSURE PHENOTYPES ON AMBULATORY BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING IN WOMEN

Tiago Aguiar,Inês Cruz,Carlos Costa,Simão Carvalho,Adriana Pacheco,Eline Barbosa,José Bastos
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjh.0001022836.60754.45
IF: 4.9
2024-05-01
Journal of Hypertension
Abstract:Objective: Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is a highly valuable and well-validated tool in the diagnosis and treatment follow-up of hypertensive patients. It remains unclear whether the different blood pressure (BP) phenotypes have a different prognostic impact in women. Design and method: A retrospective cohort study which followed a sequential number of 947 patients who underwent ABPM. BP phenotypes were defined as: controlled hypertension (CH); resistant hypertension (RH); and white-coat uncontrolled hypertension (WCUH). A composite endpoint (CE) of all-cause mortality and hospitalization from cardiovascular causes was utilized. Results: The sample comprised of 50.8% women (n=486) and 48.2% men (n=461) (mean age of 59 years). The sampled included 129 (13.5%) cases of CH, 103 (10.7%) cases of RH, and 289 (30.1%) cases of WCUH. A Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis was performed, with women demonstrating a superior survival as compared to men, with a log rank of 31.7 (p<0.001). Women with WUCH and RH showed superior survival with a log rank of 11.5 and 15.2, respectively (p<0.001). (Fig 1) In a multi-variate analysis, men showed a greater hazard ratio (HR) as compared to women in: 24h systolic BP (SBP) with a HR of 1.05 (p=0.08) versus 1.02 (p=0.43); 24h pulse pressure (PP) with a HR of 1.07 (p=0.05) versus 1.02 (p=0.34); night SBP with a HR of 1.04 (p=0.02) versus 1.03 (p=0.06); night PP with a HR of 1.10 (p<0.01) versus 1.04 (p=0.08); and SBP dipping with a HR of 0.93 (p=0.03) versus 0.95 (p=0.08). HR for RH women for night SBP, night DBP and SBP dipping were 1.06, 1.13 and 0.89, respectively (p<0.01). Conclusions: ABPM is an essential tool for the diagnosis and follow-up of different BP phenotypes. Women revealed a more favourable cardiovascular prognosis as compared to men, suggesting a lower dependence on blood pressure. In true RH women, nighttime variables showed a significant impact on cardiovascular events.
peripheral vascular disease
What problem does this paper attempt to address?