AMBULATORY AND HOME BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING FOR CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE RISK EVALUATION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDIES

Demosthenes Panagiotakos,Christina Antza,Vasilios Kotsis
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjh.0001020144.80195.95
IF: 4.9
2024-05-01
Journal of Hypertension
Abstract:Objective: The aim of this work was to systematically review the level of evidence based on prospective cohort studies investigating the role of 24-hour ABPM and HBPM on cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk prediction. Design and method: Eight studies were included in the meta-analysis. The Der Simonian and Laird's random-effects model with standard error adjustment using the Knapp-Hartung method was used. Results: Systolic BP from ABPM and HBPM were significantly, positively associated with CVD risk (combined HR per 1-SD systolic BP, 95%CI; 1.32, 1.19-1.45, I2 = 35.8%, and 1.30, 95%CI;1.11-1.49, I2 = 79.1%, respectively), after adjusting for office BP levels and other potential confounders. Diastolic BP from both ABPM and HBPM were positively associated with CVD risk (combined HR per 1-SD diastolic BP, 95%CI; 1.15, 1.01-1.29, I2 = 73.1% and 1.21, 1.05-1.37, I2 = 84.5%, respectively). Conclusions: BP either from ABPM or HBPM could predict CVD risk. As so, at least one of out-of-office BP measurements has to be taken into account during the evaluation of the hypertensive population.
peripheral vascular disease
What problem does this paper attempt to address?