Abstract:Three concrete buildings with six storeys above ground and two basements have been designed in detail according to the first generation of Eurocodes 2 (including structural fire design) and 8, as well as the official drafts of their second generation counterparts as of the end of 2023. In one horizontal direction the buildings have a wall-, frame-equivalent-dual- or frame-lateral-load-resisting system; in the other, the first two buildings have a wall-system and the third a wall-equivalent-dual. The design seismic action is in all cases according to the current generation Eurocode 8, scaled to a peak ground acceleration on rock of 0.2 or 0.3 g. Seismic design is for ductility class (DC) Medium (M) of the current generation or DC 3 of the new one, which have the same behaviour factors, q , in all structural systems considered; so, in each building seismic action effects from the analysis are the same for the two Eurocode generations. All designs are assessed through nonlinear response history analysis (NLRHA), carried out according to the pertinent Eurocode 8 rules. Designs according to the second generation meet the performance goals of Eurocode 8 much better and transparently than with the first generation, but use markedly larger steel quantities and indeed often unnecessarily so, especially for confining reinforcement—which sometimes comes out in quantities that cannot be placed. Proposals are made for a more rational linkage of local ductility demands with the q -factor and implemented in alternative second generation designs. Minor changes to the new generation's design/detailing rules for ductile walls are also proposed and implemented in these alternative designs; they prove only partially effective in resolving certain deadlocks originating from poorly justified detailing rules that produce unnecessary and counterproductive wall flexural overstrengths. The new generation Eurocode 8 lacks design rules for the free height of ductile walls within rigid basements, which is a weak link, very likely to fail under the high shear force which balances the wall's moment resistance at the top of the rigid basement. NLRHA confirms that the alternative provisions proposed for second generation Eurocode 8 give more cost-effective designs than the first generation, with better overall performance at about the same or even lower cost.

Critical analysis of seismic codes' provisions on second order effects

Static and dynamic inelastic P -Δ effect for seismic design

Seismic loss-of-support conditions of frictional beam-to-column connections

Dynamic P-△ Effects on Seismic Force Modification Factors

Influence of the modelling approach on the seismic assessment of RC structures by nonlinear static analyses

Seismic strengthening of isolated RC framed structures through orthogonal steel exoskeleton: Bidirectional non-linear analyses

Comparative application to RC buildings of the two generations of Eurocodes and proposals for seismic design

An efficient framework for structural seismic collapse capacity assessment based on an equivalent SDOF system

Evaluating alternative approaches for the seismic design of structures

Effects of Multi-Directional Seismic Input on Non-Linear Static Analysis of Existing Reinforced Concrete Structures

Comparative Assessment of Soil-Structure Interaction Regulations of ASCE 7-16 and ASCE 7-10

The Modification of Strength Reduction Factors for MDOF Effect

Dynamic Increase Factor for Nonlinear Static Analysis of RC Frame Buildings Against Progressive Collapse

Study on Seismic Collapse Capacity of Single-Degree-of-freedom Structural System

Comparative assessment of nonlinear static and dynamic methods for analysing building response under sequential earthquake and tsunami

Seismic Effectiveness of Integrated Redesign of Structures Considering Soil- Structure Interaction

Modelling and Seismic Response Analysis of Italian Code-Conforming Base-Isolated Buildings

Assessment of alternative design approaches for seismic upgrading of RC frame structures with steel exoskeletons

Effects of Seismic and Progressive Collapse Designs on the Vulnerability of RC Frame Structures

Raising the bar in seismic design: cost–benefit analysis of alternative design methodologies and earthquake-resistant technologies

Incorporating Modeling Uncertainties in the Collapse Assessment of Capacity-Designed Steel Moment Frames under Seismic Loading