Synergizing Curricula Through Structured Review of Interprofessional Palliative Care Competencies (GP731)
Carolyn Kezar,Sandhya Narukonda,Richard Taylor,Michael Barnett,Elizabeth McAlister,Ella Bowman,Chao-Hui Huang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.04.122
IF: 5.576
2022-05-17
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Abstract:Outcomes 1. Identify at least 3 major areas of competency overlap among palliative care subspecialties 2. Target 1 opportunity for interprofessional education within their own team Background Despite the need to provide high-quality training to interprofessional learners, competency-based interprofessional education (IPE) in palliative care is limited. By nature, most subspecialty training programs have been developed in professional silos and within smaller programs that may have few learners and even fewer educators, highlighting the need to synergize teaching efforts. Aim Statement We aim to identify shared competencies across subspecialty training programs (geriatric medicine, hospice and palliative medicine, advanced practice palliative care subspecialty nursing, and palliative psychology) and decrease teaching redundancy while increasing interprofessional learner collaboration. Methods We conducted 5 cycles of cross-disciplinary structured review using 1:1 discipline assessment dyads with clinician educators comprised of palliative-geriatrics, geriatrics–nurse practitioner(NP), NP-psychology, psychology-palliative, and a fifth round of independent review by a program coordinator/instructional designer. Foundational curricular feedback and support documents used in this review include the Palliative Physician Fellowship Curricular Milestones, Geriatric Physician Fellowship Curricular Milestones, Competencies for the Hospice and Palliative Advanced Practice Nurse, and Palliative Care Competencies for Psychologists. Final review of IPE core training competencies was conducted by all disciplines to reach expert consensus. Results Findings from the palliative-geriatrics-nursing-psychology IPE curriculum crossmatch identify an intersecting set of competencies across all four disciplines. Total match percentages highlight shared or overlapped competency areas and discipline-specific competencies. During the curriculum review process, we were able to identify gaps in current teaching content and to incorporate findings into more holistic and innovative strategies for IPE across disciplines, synergizing teaching content while conserving IPE educators' time. Conclusions and Implications Our innovative curriculum crossmatch synergizes subspecialty palliative IPE learning experiences for both educators and learners. Future work will focus on developing assessment tools to evaluate IPE teaching outcomes to improve quality of didactic experience for combined disciplines and learners and creating an infrastructure that provides feedback to interprofessional educators to enhance professional development.
medicine, general & internal,clinical neurology,health care sciences & services