How syllabi relate to outcomes in higher education: A study of syllabi learner-centeredness and grade inequities in STEM

Maryam Eslami,Kameryn Denaro,Penelope Collins,Jacklyn M. Sumarsono,Michael Dennin,Brian Sato
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301331
IF: 3.7
2024-04-17
PLoS ONE
Abstract:Fostering equity in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) programs can be accomplished by incorporating learner-centered pedagogies, resulting in the closing of opportunity gaps (defined here as the difference in grades earned by minoritized and non-minoritized students). We assessed STEM courses that exhibit small and large opportunity gaps at a minority-serving, research-intensive university, and evaluated the degree to which their syllabi are learner-centered, according to a previously validated rubric. We specifically chose syllabi as they are often the first interaction students have with a course, establish expectations for course policies and practices, and serve as a proxy for the course environment. We found STEM courses with more learner-centered syllabi had smaller opportunity gaps. The syllabus rubric factor that most correlated with smaller gaps was Power and Control , which reflects Student’s Role, Outside Resources, and Syllabus Focus. This work highlights the importance of course syllabi as a tool for instructors to create more inclusive classroom environments.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?