Abstract:The potential occurrence of endocrine-disrupting compounds (EDCs) as well as pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in drinking water supplies raises concern over the removal of these compounds by common drinking water treatment processes. Three drinking water supplies were spiked with 10 to 250 ng/L of 62 different EDC/ PPCPs; one model water containing an NOM isolate was spiked with 49 different EDC/PPCPs. Compounds were detected by LC/MS/MS or GC/MS/MS. These test waters were subjected to bench-scale experimentation to simulate individual treatment processes in a water treatment plant (WTP). Aluminum sulfate and ferric chloride coagulants or chemical lime softening removed some polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) but removed <25% of most other EDC/ PPCPs. Addition of 5 mg/L of powder activated carbon (PAC) with a 4-h contact time removed 50% to >98% of GC/ MS/MS compounds (more volatile) and 10% to >95% of LC/ MS/MS compounds (more polar); higher PAC dosages improved EDC/PPCP removal. EDC/PPCP percentage removal was independent of the initial compound concentration. Octanol-water partition coefficients served as a reasonable indicator of compound removal under controlled PAC test conditions, except for EDC/PPCPs that were protonated or deprotonated at the test pH and some that contained heterocyclic or aromatic nitrogen. Separate chlorine or ozone experiments decreased the EDC/PPCP initial concentration by <10% to >90%; EDC/PPCPs were likely transformed to oxidation byproducts. Ozone oxidized steroids containing phenolic moieties (estradiol, ethynylestradiol, or estrone) more efficiently than those without aromatic or phenolic moieties (androstenedione, progesterone, and testosterone). EDC/PPCP reactivity with oxidants were separated into three general groups: (1) compounds easily oxidized (>80% reacted) by chlorine are always oxidized at least as efficiently by ozone; (2) 6 of the -60 compounds (TCEP, BHC, chlordane, dieldrin, heptachlor epoxide, musk ketone) were poorly oxidized (<20% reacted) by chlorine or ozone; (3) compounds (24 of 60) reacting preferentially (higher removals) with ozone rather than chlorine. Conventional treatment (coagulation plus chlorination) would have low removal of many EDC/PPCPs, while addition of PAC and/or ozone could substantially improve their removals. Existing strategies that predict relative removals of herbicides, pesticides, and other organic pollutants by activated carbon or oxidation can be directly applied for the removal of many EDC/PPCPs, but these strategies need to be modified to account for charged (protonated bases or deprotonated acids) and aliphatic species. Some compounds (e.g., DEET, ibuprofen, gemfibrozil) had low removals unless ozonation was used. Other compounds had low removals by all the WTP processes considered (atrazine, iopromide, meprobamate, TCEP), and removal processes capable of removing these types of compounds should be investigated.

Removal characteristics of 53 micropollutants during ozonation, chlorination, and UV/H 2 O 2 processes used in drinking water treatment plant

Degradation of Micropollutants by UV–Chlorine Treatment in Reclaimed Water: pH Effects, Formation of Disinfectant Byproducts, and Toxicity Assay

Ozone Strong Water Dosing as Optimized Ozonation Process for Micropollutants Reduction in Wastewater Treatment Plants

Insight into the effect of UVC-based advanced oxidation processes on the interaction of typical microplastics and their derived disinfection byproducts during disinfection

Transformation of microplastics by oxidative water and wastewater treatment processes: A critical review

Microplastic removal in conventional drinking water treatment processes: Performance, mechanism, and potential risk

Fate of Endocrine-Disruptor, Pharmaceutical, and Personal Care Product Chemicals during Simulated Drinking Water Treatment Processes

Removal of micropollutants in drinking water using UV-LED/chlorine advanced oxidation process followed by activated carbon adsorption

Occurrence, Removal and Risk of Organic Micropollutants in Wastewater Treatment Plants Across China: Comparison of Wastewater Treatment Processes.

Physicochemical changes in microplastics and formation of DBPs under ozonation

Ozonation in advanced treatment of secondary municipal wastewater effluents for the removal of micropollutants

Efficiency of ozonation and sulfate radical - AOP for removal of pharmaceuticals, corrosion inhibitors, x-ray contrast media and perfluorinated compounds from reverse osmosis concentrates

Occurrence, removal, and prioritization of organic micropollutants in four full-scale wastewater treatment plants in Korea

Influence of effluent particles and particle-bound micropollutants on the removal of micropollutants and UVA254 in wastewater effluent ozonation

Removal of Pharmaceutical and Personal Care Products by Sequential Ultraviolet and Ozonation Process in A Full-Scale Wastewater Treatment Plant

A comparative study of UV/H 2 O 2 and UV/PDS for the degradation of micro-pollutants: kinetics and effect of water matrix

Ozonation of Representative Endocrine Disruptors (eds) in Water

Modifications to sorption and sinking capability of microplastics after chlorination

Insight into the Dynamic Transformation Properties of Microplastic-Derived Dissolved Organic Matter and Its Contribution to the Formation of Chlorination Disinfection By-Products

Fate of Naturally Dissolved Organic Matter and Synthetic Organic Compounds Subjected to Drinking Water Treatment Using Membrane, Activated Carbon, and UV/H2O2 Technologies

Impact of anaerobic zone on biodegradation of micropollutants: Comparison of micropollutants' removal efficiencies in lab-scale anaerobic bioreactor and in full-scale anaerobic zone