Abstract:<p>There are numerous studies on the identification and explanation of the implementation gap of planning support systems (PSS), that support the smart planning process by analyzing and visualizing data, but which are currently not systematically used in urban planning practice. There is insufficient knowledge about how the PSS implementation gap can be bridged and how PSS can be embedded into the planning process. This study provides insight into how the City Analytics Lab (CAL) can contribute to the promise of smart planning. It aims to first determine how CAL can yield the promise of smart planning. Then it provides insight into how CAL can contribute to close the PSS implementation gap. Accordingly, we organized fifteen workshops and surveyed planning practitioners (<em>N</em> = 89) at CAL to assess its usefulness for smart planning as well as its contribution in bridging the PSS implementation gap. The results show that users are positive towards the usefulness and usability of the support tools in the CAL, in particular the collaborative nature of the lab through its interactive tables and software applications. With regards to the PSS implementation gap, we find that there is a continued and increasingly successful conversation between the CAL and it's PSS tools and planning practice (i.e. 'technology-to-people') by collaborating with local governments, industry partners and other universities. However, further refinement of the lab through continued conversation between users and developers (i.e. 'people-to-people') is necessary, where tools are codesigned and user preferences and participation protocols are further considered. More broadly this research suggests that Planning Support Theatres, such as CAL can assist in reducing the technology adoption barriers commonly experienced in the application of PSS in practice. Such Planning Support Theatres, also provide a space to support new ideas and interactions importantly between both the key actors and the technology and the actors themselves.</p>

Great in Theory, but . . .: Planner's Perceptions of Queensland's Performance-Based System

To what extent ‘an entirely new approach to how planning is done’? Tracing planning system reform in New South Wales

Spatial Planning Implementation Effectiveness: Review and Research Prospects

Post-decision project evaluation of UK public–private partnerships: insights from planning practice

Exploring the views of planners and public health practitioners on integrating health evidence into spatial planning in England: a mixed-methods study

Healthy urban planning: an institutional policy analysis of strategic planning in Sydney, Australia

Plans, performance information and accountability: the case of Best Value

ANALYSING PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT IN PUBLIC SERVICES: HOW USEFUL IS THE CONCEPT OF A PERFORMANCE REGIME?

Perspectives or Misperceptions? Why Better Land-Use Data Are Critical to Housing Policy Debates

Challenging complacency in construction management research: the case of PPPs

Spatial Plans as a Critical Intervention in Improving Population Health. A Discourse Arising from a Health Census Review of the State of Current Local Planning Policy in England

Comprehensive performance assessment in English local government

Effectuating Performance-Based Budgeting Takes Time

Evaluation in Urban Planning: Advances and Prospects

From Performance Budgeting to Performance Budget Management: Theory and Practice

Relating physical and service performance in local government community facilities

Life is a scene and we are the actors: Assessing the usefulness of planning support theatres for smart city planning

Understanding Post-occupancy Evaluation Processes for Public Healthcare Facilities in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand

Implementation Evaluation of Urban Growth Boundaries: An Analytical Framework for China and a Case Study of Beijing

Blending project goals and performance goals in ecological planning: Ian McHarg’s contributions to landscape performance evaluation