Implementation Evaluation of Urban Growth Boundaries: An Analytical Framework for China and a Case Study of Beijing

Yiing Long,Haoying Han,Shih-Kung Lai

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16361/j.upf.201501013

2015-01-01

Abstract:Most existing studies on urban planning implementation (UPI) evaluation examine the conformity between planned and observed urban development. The results are, however, typically too general to provide adequate policy recommendations for planners and researchers. The stages between creating a plan and its outcome are seldom discussed in detail, primarily because of the absence of anapplicable analytic framework and data. In the present paper, we propose a framework for UPI evaluation which provides an in-depth and accurate application to show how the conceptual framework for assessing conformance and performance of plans proposed by Hopkins (2012) could be applied in practice. We examined the degrees of conformance and performance between an urban master plan, detailed plans, development permits and observed development outcomes, using Beijing as an example. The results reveal discrepancies between all basic stages of plan implementation, and the poor planning implementation was primarily due to the existence of large areas of development without development permits. Moreover, there was clear cross-referencing in the planning implementation process, which undermined the formal planning implementation procedures. These results suggest that the poor match between a plan and its outcomes may result from poor plan using, not poor planning. Therefore, attention needs to be paid not only to creating plans but also to monitoring the performance of various levels of plans and development permits in the UPI.