Abstract:Abstract Objectives To compare the performance of areal Hounsfield units (aHUs), volumetric Hounsfield units (vHUs), and volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) by quantitative CT (QCT) in discriminating vertebral fractures (VFs) risk. Methods We retrospectively included CT scans of the lumbar spine 101 VFs cases (60 women, mean age: 64 ± 4 years; 41 men, mean age: 73 ± 10 years) and sex- and age-matched 101 control subjects (60 women, mean age: 64 ± 4 years; 41 men, mean age: 72 ± 7 years). In order to assess the discriminatory capability of aHU, vHU, and vBMD measurements at the L1 and L2 levels in identifying VFs, we conducted binary logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses in men and women. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated. Results In both men and women with and without VFs, aHU, vHU, and vBMD were highly correlated with each other (r2 from 0.832 to 0.957, all P < .001). There was a statistically significant difference in aHU, vHU, and vBMD between subjects with and without VFs (P < .001). When age, gender, and BMI were taken into account as covariances and adjusted simultaneously, odds ratios (ORs) for aHU, vHU, and vBMD values, which represent the risk of VFs, were significant (P < .001). Compared with aHU and vHU, vBMD was more strongly associated with VF risk (vBMD: OR, 6.29; 95% CI, 3.83-10.35 vs vHU: OR, 3.64; 95% CI, 2.43-5.46 vs aHU: OR, 2.56; 95% CI, 1.79-3.67). In both men and women, further, vBMD had higher values for AUC, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV compared to vHU, with vHU in turn surpassing aHU. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for discriminating VFs using the average aHU, vHU, and vBMD of 2 vertebrae was 0.72, 0.77, and 0.87 in men and 0.76, 0.79, and 0.86 in women. In both men and women, there exist statistically significant differences in the AUC when employing the 3 measurements—namely, aHU, vHU, and vBMD—to discriminate fractures (P < .05). Conclusions The QCT-measured vBMD is more associated with acute VFs than vHU and aHU values of the lumbar spine. Although the use of vHU and aHU values for the diagnosis of osteoporosis and discriminating fracture risk is limited to scanner- and imaging protocol-specific, they have great potential for opportunistic osteoporosis screening, particularly vHU. Advances in knowledge The novelty of this study presents a comparison of the VF discriminative capabilities among aHU, vHU, and vBMD. The vHU values introduced in this study demonstrate a greater capacity to discriminate fractures compared to aHU, presenting an improved clinical choice. Although its discriminatory capability is slightly lower than that of vBMD, it is more convenient to measure and does not require specialized software.

Feasibility study in quantitative identification of fresh and old osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture by vertebral CT value and CT value difference

The quality of bone and paraspinal muscle in the fragility osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a comprehensive comparison between different indicators

Differentiation of usual vertebral compression fractures using CT histogram analysis as quantitative biomarkers: A proof-of-principle study

Comparison of the predictive values of MRI-based vertebral bone quality scores for the determination of osteoporosis in different diseases

Simultaneous comparison of three methods for bone quality assessment

Study of the types of osteoporotic vertebral fractures and the difference of volumetric BMD detected using QCT

Opportunistic use of lumbar computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for osteoporosis screening

Vertebral bone quality different in magnetic resonance imaging parameters

Densitometric and geometric measurement of the proximal femur in elderly women with and without osteoporotic vertebral fractures by volumetric quantitative multi-slice CT

Advances in Research on Application of Quantitative CT in Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment of Osteoporosis

Study on the Condition of Aging Vertebral Fracture Patients with Aging Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Correlation analysis of the vertebral compression degree and CT Hounsfield units in elderly patients with osteoporotic thoracolumbar fractures

Correlation analysis of the vertebral compression degree and CT HU value in elderly patients with osteoporotic thoracolumbar fractures

Assessment of volumetric bone mineral density of the femoral neck in postmenopausal women with and without vertebral fractures using quantitative multi-slice CT

Modified pedicle subtraction osteotomy for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a retrospective study of 104 patients

CT Measurement and Analysis of the Target Vertebral Body in Elderly Patients with Uncompressed Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Fractures

Feasibility study of opportunistic osteoporosis screening on chest CT using a multi-feature fusion DCNN model

The Use of CT Hounsfield Unit Values to Identify the Undiagnosed Spinal Osteoporosis in Patients with Lumbar Degenerative Diseases

Comparisons of Hounsfield units and volumetric bone density in discriminating vertebral fractures on lumbar CT scans

Discrimination of Vertebral Fragility Fracture with Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density Measured by Quantitative Computed Tomography

MRI-based Vertebral Bone Quality Score for Osteoporosis Screening Based on Different Osteoporotic Diagnostic Criteria Using DXA and QCT