Abstract:The urgency of climate change calls for rapid mitigation and bioenergy is projected to play a major role in temperate regions. To comprehensively examine the environmental sustainability implications of expanding agricultural bioenergy production, we synthesized the existing scientific literature on biodiversity and ecosystem service impacts from land‐use changes to feedstock production in temperate agricultural landscapes. Synergistic benefits for biodiversity and ecosystem services mainly occur when perennial feedstock is integrated into intensive arable landscapes. The use of marginal and abandoned land could alleviate trade‐offs with food production, but our review shows that ecological impacts are largely unknown and needs further research. The Paris agreement on climate change requires rapid reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. One important mitigation strategy, at least in the intermediate future, is the substitution of fossil fuels with bioenergy. However, using agriculture‐ and forest‐derived biomass for energy has sparked controversy regarding both the climate mitigation potential and conflicts with biodiversity conservation. The urgency of the climate crisis calls for using forests for carbon sequestration and storage rather than for bioenergy, making agricultural biomass an attractive alternative for fossil energy substitution. However, this calls for comprehensive assessments of its sustainability in terms of consequences for biodiversity and ecosystem services. In this review, we provide a first holistic overview of the impacts on ecosystems of land‐use changes from bioenergy crop production in temperate climates, by synthesizing results on both biodiversity and ecosystem service impacts. We found that bioenergy‐related land‐use changes can have both positive and negative effects on ecosystems, with original land use, bioenergy crop type and scale of bioenergy production being important moderators of impacts. Despite the risk of opportunity cost for food production, perennial crop cultivation on arable land had the lowest occurrence of negative impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Growing biomass for bioenergy on surplus land has been suggested as a way to alleviate competition with food production and biodiversity conservation, but our results demonstrate that utilizing marginal or abandoned land for bioenergy crop production cannot fully resolve these trade‐offs. Furthermore, there is a lack of empirical studies of the biodiversity value of marginal and abandoned land, limiting our understanding of the sustainability implications of biomass cultivation on surplus land. We argue that future research and policies for bioenergy production must explicitly consider biodiversity and ecosystem services in combination to avoid potential trade‐offs between the two and to ensure sustainable bioenergy production.

Land-free bioenergy from circular agroecology -- A diverse option space and trade-offs

Model-based scenarios for achieving net negative emissions in the food system

Spatially Explicit Analyses of Sustainable Agricultural Residue Potential for Bioenergy in China under Various Soil and Land Management Scenarios

Bioenergy crops, biodiversity and ecosystem services in temperate agricultural landscapes—A review of synergies and trade‐offs

Enhanced Food System Efficiency is the Key to China’s 2060 Carbon Neutrality Target

Bioenergy in Europe is unlikely to make a timely contribution to climate change targets

Global land-use and sustainability implications of enhanced bioenergy import of China

Potential of land-based climate change mitigation strategies on abandoned cropland

Robust paths to net greenhouse gas mitigation and negative emissions via advanced biofuels

Large-scale bioenergy production: how to resolve sustainability trade-offs?

Temperature Changes Induced by Biogeochemical and Biophysical Effects of Bioenergy Crop Cultivation

Cost‐effective use of abandoned agricultural land for biofuel production

New feed sources key to ambitious climate targets

Energy balance and greenhouse gas emissions in an agroforestry system - a case study from Eastern Germany

Managing Soil Carbon Sequestration: Assessing the Effects of Intermediate Crops, Crop Residue Removal, and Digestate Application on Swedish Arable Land

Mechanisms Controlling Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Soils

Consensus, uncertainties and challenges for perennial bioenergy crops and land use

Natural climate solutions versus bioenergy: Can carbon benefits of natural succession compete with bioenergy from short rotation coppice?

Bioenergy Crops for Low Warming Targets Require Half of the Present Agricultural Fertilizer Use

Land suitability for energy crops under scenarios of climate change and land‐use

Evaluating the Use of BECCS and Afforestation under China’s Carbon-Neutral Target for 2060