Managing Soil Carbon Sequestration: Assessing the Effects of Intermediate Crops, Crop Residue Removal, and Digestate Application on Swedish Arable Land

Sergio Alejandro Barrios Latorre,Lovisa Björnsson,Thomas Prade

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.70010

2024-11-19

GCB Bioenergy

Abstract:Within the growing bioeconomy, residual agricultural biomass presents an attractive feedstock option, though crop residue removal may be detrimental to soil quality by reducing organic carbon. Simulations of soil organic carbon in Swedish arable land indicate that intermediate crops and digestate applications can offset some carbon losses, with intermediate crops increasing soil carbon stocks at equilibrium by about 3% and digestate by around 5%, though results vary spatially. Despite these benefits, residue removal's negative effects are not fully mitigated across all locations, highlighting the need for location‐specific assessments to balance biomass utilization with soil conservation. Promoting the bioeconomy to aid in the achievement of sustainability goals has increased demand for biomass as feedstock. Residual biomass from agricultural production is an attractive option, as it is a by‐product that does not compete with food production. However, crop residues are important for the preservation of soil quality, especially for the maintenance of soil organic carbon. Therefore, their use can conflict with environmental goals and initiatives that aim to preserve soil fertility and carbon stocks. Nevertheless, the adoption of intermediate crops could compensate for the negative effects of crop residue removal. Moreover, if crop residues are used for a bioeconomy pathway such as biogas production, the resulting digestate derived from the anaerobic digestion process could be returned to the soil, providing an input of highly recalcitrant carbon. In this study, we modeled the effects of removal of crop residues, the cultivation of intermediate crops, and the application of digestate on Swedish soil organic carbon stocks. Our results suggest that the inclusion of intermediate crops could raise the carbon stocks at equilibrium by an average of 1.93 t C ha−1 (~3% increase) with a notable spatial variation. Digestate application showed a higher average increase (3.3 t C ha−1, ~5%) with an even higher variation. The removal of crop residues was detrimental in some areas, resulting in a loss of carbon, which could not be compensated for entirely by the introduction of intermediate crops or digestate recycling. Combining these two practices showed overall positive effects on soil organic carbon stocks; however, the results cannot be generalized at any spatial location, and we emphasize the importance of assessments tailored to local conditions.

energy & fuels,agronomy