Greenhouse gas mitigation on croplands: clarifying the debate on knowns, unknowns and risks to move forward with effective management interventions
Emily E. Oldfield Jocelyn M. Lavallee Jennifer Blesh Mark A. Bradford Micah Cameron-Harp M. Francesca Cotrufo Alison J. Eagle Lisa Eash Rebecca J. Even Sara E. Kuebbing Eric A. Kort Tyler J. Lark Catharina Latka Yang Lin Megan B. Machmuller Brendan O'Neill Anna M. Raffeld Taniya RoyChowdhury Joseph Rudek Jonathan Sanderman Christine D. Sprunger Theodore P. Toombs Nazli Uludere Aragon Marti Vidal Dominic Woolf Tamara J. Zelikova Doria R. Gordon a Environmental Defense Fund,Néw York,NY,USAb School for Environment and Sustainability,University of Michigan,Ann Arbor,MI,USAc The Forest School,Yale School of the Environment & Yale Center for Natural Carbon Capture,Yale University,New Haven,CT,USAd Department of Agricultural Economics,Kansas State University,Manhattan,KS,USAe Department of Soil and Crop Sciences,Colorado State University,Fort Collins,CO,USAf Climate and Space Sciences and Engineering,University of Michigan,Ann Arbor,MI,USAg Nelson Institute Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment,University of WI-Madison,Madison,WI,USAh Environmental Markets Lab (emLab),University of California,Santa Barbara,CA,USAi High Meadows Environmental Institute,Princeton University,Princeton,NJ,USAj Department of Soil,Water,and Ecosystem Sciences,University of Florida,Gainesville,FL,USAk Woodwell Climate Research Center,Falmouth,MA,USAl W.K. Kellogg Biological Station,Department of Plant,Soil,and Microbial Sciences,and Plant Resilience Institute,Michigan State University,East Lansing,MI,USAm Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group (NTSG),University of Montana,Missoula,MT,USAn Plant Production Systems Group,Wageningen University and Research,Wageningen,Netherlandso School of Integrative Plant Sciences,Cornell University,Ithaca,NY,USAp Department of Biology,University of Florida,Gainesville,FL,USA
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2024.2365896
2024-06-25
Carbon Management
Abstract:The opportunity of agricultural management practices to sequester soil organic carbon (SOC) is recognized as an important strategy for mitigating climate change. However, there is low confidence when it comes to understanding the magnitude of the climate benefit we can expect from SOC sequestration or how best to achieve it. Several issues are often confounded when it comes to the mitigation potential of SOC sequestration and greenhouse gas (GHG) reductions from agriculture, creating confusion and making it difficult to clearly identify the knowns, unknowns and risks to implementing policy and practice recommendations. Here, we identify and explain four major areas of uncertainty: (1) the expected changes in soil carbon or GHG emissions resulting from agricultural management practice changes; (2) the extent to which social, environmental and economic factors constrain mitigation potential; (3) the ability to execute reliable measurement, monitoring, reporting and verification (MMRV) frameworks; and (4) the perception of risk associated with different ways of promoting practice adoption (e.g., voluntary carbon markets fueled by the private sector, pay-for-practice programs funded by public investment). We aim to pinpoint knowledge gaps and areas of disagreement to help right-size expectations and guide effective investment in GHG removals and reductions from agriculture.
environmental sciences,environmental studies