Synchronized Diaphragmatic Stimulation As A Potential Outpatient Implant Procedure For HfrEF Therapy

Georg Becker,Tamaz Shaburishvili,Darejan Chiabrishvili,Beka Oniani,Giorgi Shaishmelashvili,Marat Fudim,Michael Mirro,Lee Goldberg
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.10.057
IF: 6.592
2024-01-01
Journal of Cardiac Failure
Abstract:Background Synchronized diaphragmatic stimulation (SDS) transiently modulates intrathoracic pressure synchronized to the cardiac cycle thereby impacting pericardial restraint, cardiac preload and afterload leading to improvements in heart failure status, including exercise tolerance, quality of life and functional cardiac measures. Symptomatic HFrEF patients on optimal GDMT with no evidence of ventricular dyssynchrony received an SDS implant. Methods The SDS system consisted of a custom implantable pulse generator (IPG) (VisCardia, USA) and active fixation sensing/stimulation leads (Myopore, Integer, USA) implanted laparoscopically. Abdominal access was obtained via two trocars (umbilicus, upper left abdomen). The laparoscope was inserted at the umbilicus and the abdomen was insufflated. The sensing and stimulating leads were introduced using a custom implant tool and affixed to the inferior right and left hemispheres of the diaphragm. The leads were attached to the IPG and electrical performance was assessed via the external programmer. Upon achieving acceptable electrical performance (sensing / capture) a subcutaneous pocket was created, IPG inserted, leads attached and pocket closed with standard sutures. Post-implant system functionality was confirmed. Implant procedure times were recorded and patients were monitored for adverse events. Results Sixteen patients (3 female) were enrolled (63 ± 12 years, NYHA III (100%)). Post-implant an imperceptible localized diaphragmatic contraction was confirmed in all patients. No acute or late device or procedure related complications occurred. The implant procedure, defined as operating room time, was 1h22mins ± 22 mins, time from beginning of procedure to ambulation was 8h38mins ± 3h10mins, and time from beginning of procedure to discharge was 24h00mins ± 3h45mins . By protocol, all patients were discharged on post-operative day 1. Conclusion The studied patient population confirms the safety of the SDS laparoscopic implantation technique. The herein reported procedure, ambulation, and discharge times as well as the absence of acute or late device or procedure related complications supports the expectation of SDS therapy being provided as an outpatient procedure.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?