Continuous aortic flow augmentation: a pilot study of hemodynamic and renal responses to a novel percutaneous intervention in decompensated heart failure

Marvin A Konstam,Barbara Czerska,Michael Böhm,Ron M Oren,Jerzy Sadowski,Sanjaya Khanal,William T Abraham,Andrae Wasler,Johannes B Dahm,Antonello Gavazzi,Sinisa Gradinac,Victor Legrand,Paul Mohacsi,Gerhard Poelzl,Branislav Radovancevic,Adrian B Van Bakel,Michael R Zile,Barry Cabuay,Krzysztof Bartus,Piet Jansen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.555367
IF: 37.8
2005-11-15
Circulation
Abstract:Background: Diminished aortic flow may induce adverse downstream vascular and renal signals. Investigations in a heart failure animal model have shown that continuous aortic flow augmentation (CAFA) achieves hemodynamic improvement and ventricular unloading, which suggests a novel therapeutic approach to patients with heart failure exacerbation that is inadequately responsive to medical therapy. Methods and results: We studied 24 patients (12 in Europe and 12 in the United States) with heart failure exacerbation and persistent hemodynamic derangement despite intravenous diuretic and inotropic and/or vasodilator treatment. CAFA (mean+/-SD 1.34+/-0.12 L/min) was achieved through percutaneous (n=19) or surgical (n=5) insertion of the Cancion system, which consists of inflow and outflow cannulas and a magnetically levitated and driven centrifugal pump. Hemodynamic improvement was observed within 1 hour. Systemic vascular resistance decreased from 1413+/-453 to 1136+/-381 dyne.s.cm(-5) at 72 hours (P=0.0008). Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure decreased from 28.5+/-4.9 to 19.8+/-7.0 mm Hg (P<0.0001), and cardiac index (excluding augmented aortic flow) increased from 1.97+/-0.44 to 2.27+/-0.43 L.min(-1).m(-2) (P=0.0013). Serum creatinine trended downward during treatment (overall P=0.095). There were 8 complications during treatment, 7 of which were self-limited. Hemodynamics remained improved 24 hours after CAFA discontinuation. Conclusions: In patients with heart failure and persistent hemodynamic derangement despite intravenous inotropic and/or vasodilator therapy, CAFA improved hemodynamics, with a reduction in serum creatinine. CAFA represents a promising, novel mode of treatment for patients who are inadequately responsive to medical therapy. The clinical impact of the observed hemodynamic improvement is currently being explored in a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?