Abstract:SIAM Journal on Computing, Volume 53, Issue 1, Page 1-46, February 2024. We consider the problem of finding nearly optimal solutions of optimization problems with random objective functions. Such problems arise widely in the theory of random graphs, theoretical computer science, and statistical physics. Two concrete problems we consider are (a) optimizing the Hamiltonian of a spherical or Ising [math]-spin glass model and (b) finding a large independent set in a sparse Erdős–Rényi graph. The following families of algorithms are considered: (a) low-degree polynomials of the input—a general framework that captures many prior algorithms; (b) low-depth Boolean circuits; (c) the Langevin dynamics algorithm, a canonical Monte Carlo analogue of the gradient descent algorithm. We show that these families of algorithms cannot have high success probability. For the case of Boolean circuits, our results improve the state-of-the-art bounds known in circuit complexity theory (although we consider the search problem as opposed to the decision problem). Our proof uses the fact that these models are known to exhibit a variant of the overlap gap property (OGP) of near-optimal solutions. Specifically, for both models, every two solutions whose objectives are above a certain threshold are either close to or far from each other. The crux of our proof is that the classes of algorithms we consider exhibit a form of stability (noise-insensitivity): a small perturbation of the input induces a small perturbation of the output. We show by an interpolation argument that stable algorithms cannot overcome the OGP barrier. The stability of Langevin dynamics is an immediate consequence of the well-posedness of stochastic differential equations. The stability of low-degree polynomials and Boolean circuits is established using tools from Gaussian and Boolean analysis—namely hypercontractivity and total influence, as well as a novel lower bound for random walks avoiding certain subsets, which we expect to be of independent interest. In the case of Boolean circuits, the result also makes use of Linial–Mansour–Nisan's classical theorem. Our techniques apply more broadly to low influence functions, and we expect that they may apply more generally.

Complexity for exact polynomial optimization strengthened with Fritz John conditions

Bounds on the infimum of polynomials over a generic semi-algebraic set using asymptotic critical values

Quasi-Slater And Farkas-Minkowski Qualifications For Semi-Infinite Programming With Applications

Exactness and Effective Degree Bound of Lasserre's Relaxation for Polynomial Optimization over Finite Variety

Parametrized systems of generalized polynomial inequalitites via linear algebra and convex geometry

The polarization hierarchy for polynomial optimization over convex bodies, with applications to nonnegative matrix rank

On the Complexity of Solution Extension of Optimization Problems

Sum-of-squares hierarchies for polynomial optimization and the Christoffel-Darboux kernel

Intrinsic complexity estimates in polynomial optimization 1

Parametrized systems of generalized polynomial equations: first applications to fewnomials

Quantum Algorithms and Lower Bounds for Finite-Sum Optimization

A Bounded Degree Lasserre Hierarchy with SOCP Relaxations for Global Polynomial Optimization and Applications

On the Optimal Lower and Upper Complexity Bounds for a Class of Composite Optimization Problems

The algebraic degree of sparse polynomial optimization

Discrete Dynamical System Approaches for Boolean Polynomial Optimization

On the complexity of some fuzzy integer programs

Fine-Grained Equivalence for Problems Related to Integer Linear Programming

Hardness of Random Optimization Problems for Boolean Circuits, Low-Degree Polynomials, and Langevin Dynamics

Convexification of box-constrained polynomial optimization problems via monomial patterns

On the Complexity of Finite-Sum Smooth Optimization under the Polyak-Łojasiewicz Condition

Better bounds on Grothendieck constants of finite orders