Abstract:SIAM Journal on Computing, Volume 53, Issue 1, Page 1-46, February 2024. We consider the problem of finding nearly optimal solutions of optimization problems with random objective functions. Such problems arise widely in the theory of random graphs, theoretical computer science, and statistical physics. Two concrete problems we consider are (a) optimizing the Hamiltonian of a spherical or Ising [math]-spin glass model and (b) finding a large independent set in a sparse Erdős–Rényi graph. The following families of algorithms are considered: (a) low-degree polynomials of the input—a general framework that captures many prior algorithms; (b) low-depth Boolean circuits; (c) the Langevin dynamics algorithm, a canonical Monte Carlo analogue of the gradient descent algorithm. We show that these families of algorithms cannot have high success probability. For the case of Boolean circuits, our results improve the state-of-the-art bounds known in circuit complexity theory (although we consider the search problem as opposed to the decision problem). Our proof uses the fact that these models are known to exhibit a variant of the overlap gap property (OGP) of near-optimal solutions. Specifically, for both models, every two solutions whose objectives are above a certain threshold are either close to or far from each other. The crux of our proof is that the classes of algorithms we consider exhibit a form of stability (noise-insensitivity): a small perturbation of the input induces a small perturbation of the output. We show by an interpolation argument that stable algorithms cannot overcome the OGP barrier. The stability of Langevin dynamics is an immediate consequence of the well-posedness of stochastic differential equations. The stability of low-degree polynomials and Boolean circuits is established using tools from Gaussian and Boolean analysis—namely hypercontractivity and total influence, as well as a novel lower bound for random walks avoiding certain subsets, which we expect to be of independent interest. In the case of Boolean circuits, the result also makes use of Linial–Mansour–Nisan's classical theorem. Our techniques apply more broadly to low influence functions, and we expect that they may apply more generally.

Intrinsic complexity estimates in polynomial optimization 1

Bounds on the infimum of polynomials over a generic semi-algebraic set using asymptotic critical values

On the Complexity of Nonlinear Mixed-Integer Optimization

Complexity for exact polynomial optimization strengthened with Fritz John conditions

The Bit Complexity of Efficient Continuous Optimization

Hardness of Random Optimization Problems for Boolean Circuits, Low-Degree Polynomials, and Langevin Dynamics

Discrete Dynamical System Approaches for Boolean Polynomial Optimization

Sparse Polynomial Optimization: Theory and Practice

The Bit Complexity of Dynamic Algebraic Formulas and their Determinants

Convex Optimization: Algorithms and Complexity

On Matrices over a Polynomial Ring with Restricted Subdeterminants

On the complexity of analyticity in semi-definite optimization

Fine-Grained Equivalence for Problems Related to Integer Linear Programming

Convergence Rates of Sums of Squares Hierarchies for Polynomial Optimization

S-SOS: Stochastic Sum-Of-Squares for Parametric Polynomial Optimization

Polynomial worst-case iteration complexity of quasi-Newton primal-dual interior point algorithms for linear programming

Complexity of Single Loop Algorithms for Nonlinear Programming with Stochastic Objective and Constraints

Sparse Polynomial Matrix Optimization

The Communication Complexity of Optimization

The algebraic degree of sparse polynomial optimization

Convex Discrete Optimization