Predicting the memorability of scene pictures: Improved accuracy through one's own experience

Sofia Navarro-Báez,Monika Undorf,Arndt Bröder
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218241239829
IF: 2.138
2024-03-30
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Abstract:Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Ahead of Print. There are conflicting findings regarding the accuracy of metamemory for scene pictures. Judgements of stimulus memorability in general (memorability judgements [MJs]) have been reported to be unpredictive of actual image memorability. However, other studies have found that judgements of learning (JOLs)—predictions of one's own later memory performance for recently studied items—are moderately predictive of people's own actual recognition memory for pictures. The current study directly compared the relative accuracy and cue basis of JOLs and MJs for scene pictures. In Experiments 1 and 2, participants completed an MJ task and a JOL task in counterbalanced order. In the MJ task, they judged the general memorability of each picture. In the JOL task, they studied pictures and made JOLs during a learning phase, followed by a recognition memory test. Results showed that MJs were predictive of general scene memorability and relied on the same cues as JOLs, but MJ accuracy considerably improved after the JOL task. Experiment 3 demonstrated that prior learning experiences drove this increase in MJ accuracy. This work demonstrates that people can predict not only their own future memory performance for scene pictures with moderate accuracy but also the general memorability of scene pictures. In addition, experiences with one's own learning and memory support the ability to assess scene memorability in general. This research contributes to our understanding of the basis and accuracy of different metamemory judgements.
psychology, experimental,physiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?