Abstract:Critical micelle concentration (CMC) is the main chemical–physical parameter to be determined for pure surfactants for their characterization in terms of surface activity and self-assembled aggregation. The CMC values can be calculated from different techniques (e.g., tensiometry, conductivity, fluorescence spectroscopy), able to follow the variation of a physical property with surfactant concentrations. Different mathematical approaches have been applied for the determination of CMC values from the raw experimental data. Most of them are independent of the operator, despite not all of the fitting procedures employed so far can be applied in all techniques. In this experimental work, the second derivative of the experimental data has been proposed as a unique approach to determine the CMC values from different techniques (tensiometry, conductimetry, densimetry, spectrofluorimetry, and high-resolution ultrasound spectroscopy). To this end, the CMC values of five different surfactants, specifically three anionic (sodium dodecyl sulfate, sodium deoxycolate, and N-lauroyl sarcosinate) and two nonionic, such as polyethylene glycol ester surfactants [polyethylenglicol (8) monostearate and polyethylenglicol (8) monolaurate], have been determined by this approach. The "second-derivate" approach provides a reliable determination of the CMC values among all of the techniques investigated, which were comparable to those calculated by the other operator-free routinely methods employed, such as segmental linear regression or Boltzmann regression. This study also highlighted the strengths and shortcomings of each technique over the others, providing an overview of the CMC values of commonly used anionic and nonionic surfactants in the pharmaceutical field, determined by employing different experimental approaches.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c00420?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c00420</a>.ESI mass spectra of all surfactants; DSC traces for all surfactants; conductivity vs concentration plot for the anionic surfactants; sound speed vs concentration plot for the PEG8-L surfactant; CMC values calculated by the segmental linear regression method for all surfactants according to the different techniques used and the CMC values calculated by the Boltzmann nonlinear fitting of fluorescence raw data; and fluorescence intensity (peak I/III) vs concentration plots for all surfactants (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c00420/suppl_file/la0c00420_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.

Synergy between surfactants’ stiffness and concentration on their self-assembly into reverse micelles as water droplet carriers in nonpolar solvents

Self assembly of model surfactants as reverse micelles in nonpolar solvents and their role as interfacial tension modifiers

Self-assembly Behaviors of Zwitterionic Heterogemini Surfactant at an Oil-Water Interface: A Dissipative Particle Dynamics Study

Simulating micelle self-assembly to assess potential for viscosity build in surfactant formulations

Coarse-grained simulations of concentration-dependent molecular self-assembly of Polysorbate 80 in water

Self-assembly of mixed surfactants sodium dodecylsulfate and polyethylene glycol dodecyl ether in aqueous solutions

Experimental and simulation study of reverse micelles formed by aerosol-OT and water in non-polar solvents

Surfactant Self-Assembling and Critical Micelle Concentration: One Approach Fits All?

Coalescence of sessile aqueous droplets laden with surfactant

Molecular Simulation Study on the Self-Assembly Behaviors of Zwitterionic Heterogemini Surfactant in Aqueous Solution

Dynamic Susceptibility and Structural Heterogeneity of Large Reverse Micellar Water: An Examination of the Core-Shell Model via Probing the Layer-wise Features

A Liquid CO2-compatible Hydrocarbon Surfactant: Experiment and Modelling.

Molecular Simulation and Experimental Studies on the Interfacial Properties of a Mixed Surfactant SDS/C(4)mimBr

Water confined in self-assembled ionic surfactants nano-structures

The intrinsic interfacial structure of ionic surfactant monolayers at water–oil and water–vapour interfaces

Aerosol-OT surfactant forms stable reverse micelles in aploar solvent in the absence of water

Effect of surfactant concentration on the responsiveness of a thermoresponsive copolymer/surfactant mixture with potential application on Smart foams formulations

Quantifying the Critical Micelle Concentration of Nonionic and Ionic Surfactants by Self-Consistent Field Theory

Coarse-grained Molecular Dynamics Study on the Rheological Behaviors of Surfactant Aqueous Solution

Self-Assembly in Mixtures of Polymers and Small Associating Molecules