Abstract:Background: Lately, radiomic studies featuring the development of a signature to use in prediction models in diagnosis or prognosis outcomes have been increasingly published. While the results are shown to be promising, these studies still have many pitfalls and limitations. One of the main issues of these studies is that radiomic features depend on how the images are preprocessed before their computation. Since, in widely known and used software for radiomic features calculation, it is possible to set these preprocessing parameters before the calculation of the radiomic feature, there are ongoing studies assessing the stability and repeatability of radiomic features to find the most suitable preprocessing parameters for every used imaging modality. Materials and Methods: We performed a comprehensive literature search using four electronic databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Scopus. Mesh terms and free text were modeled in search strategies for databases. The inclusion criteria were studies where preprocessing parameters' influence on feature values and model predictions was addressed. Records lacking information on image acquisition parameters were excluded, and any eligible studies with full-text versions were included in the review process, while conference proceedings and monographs were disregarded. We used the QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2) tool to investigate the risk of bias. We synthesized our data in a table divided by the imaging modalities subgroups. Results: After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, we selected 43 works. This review examines the impact of preprocessing parameters on the reproducibility and reliability of radiomic features extracted from multimodality imaging (CT, MRI, CBCT, and PET/CT). Standardized preprocessing is crucial for consistent radiomic feature extraction. Key preprocessing steps include voxel resampling, normalization, and discretization, which influence feature robustness and reproducibility. In total, 44% of the included works studied the effects of an isotropic voxel resampling, and most studies opted to employ a discretization strategy. From 2021, several studies started selecting the best set of preprocessing parameters based on models' best performance. As for comparison metrics, ICC was the most used in MRI studies in 58% of the screened works. Conclusions: From our work, we highlighted the need to harmonize the use of preprocessing parameters and their values, especially in light of future studies of prospective studies, which are still lacking in the current literature.

The effect of feature normalization methods in radiomics

The effect of data resampling methods in radiomics

Intensity Normalization Techniques and Their Effect on the Robustness and Predictive Power of Breast MRI Radiomics

Normalization of multicenter CT radiomics by a generative adversarial network method

Impact of MRI radiomic feature normalization for prognostic modelling in uterine endometrial and cervical cancers

Measuring the bias of incorrect application of feature selection when using cross-validation in radiomics

Comparative performances of machine learning algorithms in radiomics and impacting factors

Minimising multi-centre radiomics variability through image normalisation: a pilot study

Insights into radiomics: impact of feature selection and classification

Feature selection methods and predictive models in CT lung cancer radiomics

Impact of Preprocessing Parameters in Medical Imaging-Based Radiomic Studies: A Systematic Review

Radiomics and Deep Features: Robust Classification of Brain Hemorrhages and Reproducibility Analysis Using a 3D Autoencoder Neural Network

Optimizing radiomics for prostate cancer diagnosis: feature selection strategies, machine learning classifiers, and MRI sequences

Unraveling Radiomics Complexity: Strategies for Optimal Simplicity in Predictive Modeling

The Effect of Image Resampling on the Performance of Radiomics-Based Artificial Intelligence in Multicenter Prostate MRI

On Sensitivity and Robustness of Normalization Schemes to Input Distribution Shifts in Automatic MR Image Diagnosis

MIL normalization —— prerequisites for accurate MRI radiomics analysis

Standardization of imaging methods for machine learning in neuro-oncology

Investigating the Impact of Different Data Representation with Several Classification Models on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

The impact of high-order features on performance of radiomics studies in CT non-small cell lung cancer

Introduction to Radiomics