EMS Bypass to Endovascular Stroke Centers is Associated with Shorter Time to Thrombolysis and Thrombectomy for LVO Stroke

Alexander Kuc,Ryan Overberger,Derek L. Isenberg,Kevin A. Henry,Huquing Zhao,Adam Sigal,Susan Wojcik,Joseph Herres,Ethan Brandler,Jason T. Nomura,Chadd K. Kraus,Daniel Ackerman,Arianna Peluso,Nina Gentile
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2388882
2024-08-22
Prehospital Emergency Care
Abstract:Objectives Large vessel occlusion (LVO) strokes may be eligible for treatment with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and endovascular therapy (EVT). Patients selected for treatment have better neurologic outcomes with EVT, and delays in this therapy lead to worse outcomes. However, EVT is offered at a limited number of hospitals, referred to as endovascular stroke centers (ESC). This poses a difficult decision for EMS: to take potential stroke patients to the closest primary stroke center (PSC) or longer transport time to a more distant ESC. We hypothesized that patients with LVO stroke undergoing EVT transported directly to an ESC would have more favorable outcomes as measured by the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 90 days, compared to transport to a PSC followed by transfer to an ESC.
public, environmental & occupational health,emergency medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?