Association Between Endovascular Therapy Time to Treatment and Outcomes in Patients with Basilar Artery Occlusion

Raed A. Joundi,Jie-Lena Sun,Ying Xian,Brooke Alhanti,Raul G. Nogueira,Deepak L. Bhatt,Gregg C. Fonarow,Jeffrey Saver,Lee H. Schwamm,Eric E. Smith
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.056554
IF: 37.8
2022-01-22
Circulation
Abstract:Background: Basilar artery occlusion (BAO) is a devastating condition without definitive evidence to guide treatment. While the association between faster treatment times with endovascular therapy (EVT) and better outcomes in anterior circulation is well established, whether this relationship exists for those with BAO is not well delineated. Methods: We used individual-level patient data from the Get With The Guidelines-Stroke nationwide US registry prospectively collected from January 2015 to December 2019. We identified individuals with basilar artery occlusion treated with EVT within 24 hours of symptom onset. Our main outcomes were in-hospital mortality, discharge home, ambulatory at discharge, independence at discharge (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-2, substantial reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score 2b-3), and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Using logistic regression models, we evaluated the association between time from symptom onset to treatment with EVT and outcomes. Results: Among 3015 patients with BAO treated with EVT, mean age was 65.9, 38.8% were women, and the median NIHSS at presentation was 17 (IQR 8-26). Median onset-to-EVT time was 406 minutes (IQR 252-688). From 2015 to 2019, there was an overall increase in the median onset-to-EVT times (380 to 411 minutes; p=0.016) but no significant change in the proportion of patients treated within 6 hours of symptom onset (48.4% to 44.0%; p=0.17). After risk adjustment for patient and hospital-level factors there were significantly lower odds of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.55, 95% CI 0.45-0.68) and sICH (aOR 0.52, 95% CI 0.32-0.84), and significantly higher odds of ambulation at discharge (aOR 1.72, 95% CI 1.37-2.16), discharge home (aOR 2.19, 95% CI 1.73-2.77), and independence at discharge (aOR 2.21, 95% CI 1.66-2.95) when onset-to-EVT time was ≤6 hours compared to those >6 hours. The fastest decay in good outcomes per hour occurred within 6 hours of symptom onset. Conclusions: Among patients receiving EVT for BAO, faster treatment from symptom onset was associated with improved outcomes. These findings support efforts to achieve rapid treatment with EVT for those with BAO.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems,peripheral vascular disease
What problem does this paper attempt to address?