Abstract:Abstract Background We suggest an adaptive sample size calculation method for developing clinical prediction models, in which model performance is monitored sequentially as new data comes in. Methods We illustrate the approach using data for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer ( n = 5914, 33% event fraction) and obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD; n = 4888, 44% event fraction). We used logistic regression to develop a prediction model consisting only of a priori selected predictors and assumed linear relations for continuous predictors. We mimicked prospective patient recruitment by developing the model on 100 randomly selected patients, and we used bootstrapping to internally validate the model. We sequentially added 50 random new patients until we reached a sample size of 3000 and re-estimated model performance at each step. We examined the required sample size for satisfying the following stopping rule: obtaining a calibration slope ≥ 0.9 and optimism in the c-statistic (or AUC) < = 0.02 at two consecutive sample sizes. This procedure was repeated 500 times. We also investigated the impact of alternative modeling strategies: modeling nonlinear relations for continuous predictors and correcting for bias on the model estimates (Firth’s correction). Results Better discrimination was achieved in the ovarian cancer data (c-statistic 0.9 with 7 predictors) than in the CAD data (c-statistic 0.7 with 11 predictors). Adequate calibration and limited optimism in discrimination was achieved after a median of 450 patients (interquartile range 450–500) for the ovarian cancer data (22 events per parameter (EPP), 20–24) and 850 patients (750–900) for the CAD data (33 EPP, 30–35). A stricter criterion, requiring AUC optimism < = 0.01, was met with a median of 500 (23 EPP) and 1500 (59 EPP) patients, respectively. These sample sizes were much higher than the well-known 10 EPP rule of thumb and slightly higher than a recently published fixed sample size calculation method by Riley et al. Higher sample sizes were required when nonlinear relationships were modeled, and lower sample sizes when Firth’s correction was used. Conclusions Adaptive sample size determination can be a useful supplement to fixed a priori sample size calculations, because it allows to tailor the sample size to the specific prediction modeling context in a dynamic fashion.

Sample size determinations using logistic regression with pilot data

A simple formula for the calculation of sample size in pilot studies

Sample size determination for external pilot cluster randomised trials with binary feasibility outcomes: a tutorial

Accounting for Pilot Study Uncertainty in Sample Size Determination of Randomized Controlled Trials

Sample size planning for pilot studies

Sample size determination for logistic regression revisited

Considerations in determining sample size for pilot studies

Estimating the sample size for a pilot randomised trial to minimise the overall trial sample size for the external pilot and main trial for a continuous outcome variable

Sample Size for Pilot Studies and Precision Driven Experiments

Sample Size and Power Determination for a Binary Outcome and an Ordinal Exposure when Logistic Regression Analysis Is Planned

A brief overview of pilot studies and their sample size justification

Sample size determination for logistic regression on a logit-normal distribution

Sample size determination for training cancer classifiers from microarray and RNA-seq data

Adaptive sample size determination for the development of clinical prediction models

Using Pilot Data to Size Observational Studies for the Estimation of Dynamic Treatment Regimes

Sample Size Guidelines for Logistic Regression from Observational Studies with Large Population: Emphasis on the Accuracy Between Statistics and Parameters Based on Real Life Clinical Data

A Bayesian approach on sample size calculation for comparing means.

Sample size for binary logistic prediction models: Beyond events per variable criteria

Practical Sample Size Calculations for Surveillance and Diagnostic Investigations

Minimum sample size for developing a multivariable prediction model using multinomial logistic regression

Sample size and optimal design for logistic regression with binary interaction