Ring Test: a New Interpretation to Estimate Tensile Strength of Rock

Ana Teresa Santos de Alencar,Mauro Muñiz-Menéndez,Rubén Angel Galindo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-024-03894-7
IF: 6.518
2024-06-06
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering
Abstract:The ring test was proposed by Hobbs (1965) to improve the indirect tensile test (Brazilian test), consisting in performing the standard Brazilian test on a sample with an inner hole. In the present paper, it is demonstrated that the ring test is valid to estimate the tensile strength of intact rock and it can be used to generalize with an adequate interpretation of the results (using the empirical solution proposed). Until now, the ring test was not recognized as a valid laboratory test, because the available analytical solution gave incoherent results. The three important advantages of the ring test are: (i) it ensures that failure is initiated at the center. (ii) The load necessary to reach the failure of the ring is smaller as the disc failure, so it is possible to use smaller devices that are usually more accurate. (iii) In addition, with the reduction of the load, the ring test avoids plasticization close to the jaw. Furthermore, the influence of the hole eccentricity on the results was verified, but this was negligible. The sample preparation, therefore, is very simple without the need of any special devices. More than 80 indirect traction tests were performed for the present study. Finally, and very relevant, is that the empirical solution is based on tests carried out by different authors with various rock types, which follow the same trend in all cases, and is only in function of the ratio between inner and outer diameters.
geosciences, multidisciplinary,engineering, geological
What problem does this paper attempt to address?