Abstract:Introduction The present study examines self-reported factors related to discontinuation of ADHD medication in Danish adults. Based on insights from six patient interviews, a questionnaire was developed with themes such as perception of ADHD, perceived beneficial- and adverse effects of the medication, to examine patients' reasons for continuation or discontinuation of the prescribed medication. Objectives ADHD medication has proven effective for treating ADHD in adults. Large registry-based studies have generally shown high discontinuation rates over time and focused on different risk factors, such as comorbidity, gender and socioeconomic status. However, in the present study we explore patient reported reasons for continuation or discontinuation of ADHD medication as well as what drives their choice of living with or without medication despite ADHD. Methods The present research is a questionnaire study consisting of 1,050 Danish adults who redeemed a prescription of ADHD medication for the first time between 2017-2019. Questionnaires were sent out by Statistics Denmark to 4.748 adults, a representative sample from the 17.334 Danish adults who redeemed a prescription within that period. A gap of 12 months between redemptions was defined as discontinuation and questionnaires were sent out to an equal number of patients who continued or discontinued the ADHD-medication. Chi 2 -tests were performed to examine the differences between adults who continued vs. discontinued ADHD-medication in relation to different main themes. Results The patients who continued medical treatment more strongly perceived ADHD as a biological illness whereas patients who discontinued, more strongly perceived ADHD as an illness constructed by society. Furthermore, patients who continued medical treatment reported that the medication has a more positive influence on their lives whereas patients who discontinued the medication reported that the treatment involved more negative feelings and decreased the positive sides of themselves. Finally, patients who continued the prescribed ADHD-drugs reported more strongly that they continued the treatment for themselves, to be able to work and be social than the patients who discontinued the medical treatment. Conclusions The present findings suggest that the perception of ADHD as being either a biological or social construct is central to why patients choose to continue or discontinue ADHD-medication. Moreover, patients who continued the medical treatment generally reported more positive effects of the ADHD-drugs whereas patients who discontinued the medical treatment reported different negative effects of the medication. From a clinical perspective, these findings show the importance of understanding the individual patient's perception of ADHD. These perspectives should be addressed in the clinic alongside with awareness of how ADHD-drugs may have a positive and negative effect on the individual patient. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Why do patients want medication free treatment for psychosis? An explorative study on reasons for applying to medication free programs

What is it all about? An explorative study of patients' experiences with medication free treatment

How can we best help this patient? Exploring mental health therapists' reflections on medication-free care for patients with psychosis in Norway

Treatment Preferences in Acute Psychosis: A Comparison of Patient and Staff Perspectives on Symptom Prioritization and Biopsychosocial Interventions

Use of long-acting treatments in adult social care. Experience of an Acute Inpatient Mental Health Unit

Beliefs and attitudes about medications in patients with psychosis

Volition and Perception: Why patients choose to continue or discontinue ADHD medication

Clinical experiences of guided tapering of antipsychotics for patients with schizophrenia– a case series

Ultra-brief acceptance & commitment therapy for inpatients with psychosis – a single-case experimental design investigating processes of change

Post-discharge pharmacological treatment discontinuation of forensic psychiatric patients in Sweden

Self-admission to inpatient treatment in psychiatry: lessons on implementation

Taking what you get or Getting what you Need: A Qualitative Study on Experiences with Mental Health and Welfare Services in Long-Term Recovery in First-Episode Psychosis

Implementation of guidelines on family involvement for persons with psychotic disorders in community mental health centres (IFIP): protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial

Opting out of cardiac rehabilitation in local community healthcare services: Patients' perspectives and reflections

Relationship between satisfaction with mental health services, personal recovery and quality of life among service users with psychosis: a cross-sectional study

Barriers to stopping neuroleptic (antipsychotic) treatment in people with schizophrenia, psychosis or bipolar disorder

Study protocol for virtual leisure investigating the effect of virtual reality-delivered stress reduction, entertainment and distraction on the use of coercion and need-based medication and patient satisfaction at a closed psychiatric intensive care unit - a mixed-methods pilot clinical trial

Predictors of admission to an assertive outreach service for psychosis in Lebanon

The liminal space of first-episode psychosis and its treatment: A qualitative study exploring the experience of young people participating in an antipsychotic dose reduction randomized controlled trial.

Geographical variation in compulsory mental health care: cause for concern and source of causal inference

Daily functioning and symptom factors contributing to attitudes toward antipsychotic treatment and treatment adherence in outpatients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders