Abstract:Background There is little knowledge of what factors are needed for successful chronic pain management. We aim to identify psychosocial and treatment predictors of clinical recovery and improved quality of life (QOL) at 12‐month follow‐up across three chronic pain groups, based on the International Classification of Diseases‐11: neuropathic pain, secondary non‐neuropathic pain, and primary pain. Furthermore, we investigate baseline differences across diagnostic groups. Methods The sample included baseline and 12‐month follow‐up data from 1056 chronic pain patients from the Oslo University Hospital's Pain Registry. Logistic regression models investigated longitudinal associations between psychosocial and treatment characteristics, and the outcome measures clinical recovery and improved QOL. Characteristics were compared across the diagnostic groups. Results Increased odds of clinical recovery and improved QOL were seen in patients receiving invasive treatment (OR = 8.04, 95% CI = 3.50–19.40; OR = 5.47, 95% CI = 2.42–12.86), while decreased odds of clinical recovery were seen for secondary non‐neuropathic pain patients with pain‐related disability (0.05, 95% CI = 0.01–0.29). In comparing baseline characteristics, neuropathic pain patients had lower QOL, and more severe insomnia compared to the other groups. Conclusion Invasive treatment modalities were strongly associated with clinical recovery and improved QOL. Although this could be due to patient selection, it does warrant further examination as an intervention alternative for chronic pain. Intervention efficacy, risk factors and predictors of clinical recovery across diagnostic groups should be further investigated through longitudinal RCTs. Significance This observational study indicates a potential advantage in sustained recovery for pre‐selected individuals with chronic pain who undergo invasive treatments. The relationship between sustained recovery and psychosocial factors differs across neuropathic, secondary non‐neuropathic, and primary pain patients. This suggests that employing ICD‐11 for classifying patients into mechanistically distinct pain groups could inform the evaluation and management of chronic pain. Furthermore, factors previously identified as negative indicators for long‐term outcomes in chronic pain cohorts were not clinically significant in this study.

Relationship between satisfaction with mental health services, personal recovery and quality of life among service users with psychosis: a cross-sectional study

Service and Treatment Factors as Predictors of Satisfaction with Mental Health Services Among Service Users with Psychosis

Influence of mental health service provision on the perceived quality of life among psychiatric outpatients: associations and mediating factors

Health-related quality of life in psychiatric outpatients: a cross-sectional study of associations with symptoms, diagnoses, and employment status

Taking what you get or Getting what you Need: A Qualitative Study on Experiences with Mental Health and Welfare Services in Long-Term Recovery in First-Episode Psychosis

Perspectives on Recovery-Oriented Care in Mental Health Practices: Health Professionals Experiences

Consumers lived experiences and satisfaction with sub-acute mental health residential services

User satisfaction in child and adolescent mental health service: Comparison of background, clinical and service predictors for adolescent and parent satisfaction

In Pursuit of Recovery: A Comparative Study of Stakeholder Perspectives on Outcomes of People with Psychosis

Assessing the perceived value of a user‐led educational intervention to support recovery in a Swedish psychiatric organization: A qualitative case study

How can we best help this patient? Exploring mental health therapists' reflections on medication-free care for patients with psychosis in Norway

Personal recovery in first-episode psychosis: Beyond clinical and functional recovery

Service users' perceptions of recovery from recent‐onset psychosis and their long journey to and through psychiatric treatment

[A Correlational Study of the Recovery Process in Patients With Mental Illness]

Dimensions and predictors of clinical and personal recovery in first‐episode psychoses: Results from a cross‐sectional study

Social Satisfaction and Living Alone: Predictors of Self-Perception of Mental Health Improvement After Psychosis

Associations of long‐term clinical recovery and improved quality of life across ICD‐11 chronic pain categories in a real‐world registry study

Continuity of care as experienced by mental health service users - a qualitative study

Implementation of the Recovery Model and Its Outcomes in Patients with Severe Mental Disorder

Evaluation of health services and treatment alliance among extensively hospitalized patients due to severe self-harm - results from the Extreme Challenges project

Recovery at an Adult Psychiatric Day Hospital—A Qualitative Interview Study Describing Patients' Experiences