Virtual Reality Training for Teaching Personal Protective Equipment Skills

Keisuke Tsukada,Youichi Yasui,Satoshi Miyata,Junko Fuyumuro,Tomomi Kikuchi,Takuhiro Mizuno,Satoshi Nakayama,Hirotaka Kawano,Wataru Miyamoto
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.55358
2024-02-15
JAMA Network Open
Abstract:This randomized clinical trial examines 3 methods for teaching personal protective equipment donning and doffing techniques, including virtual reality, face-to-face, and video training, to medical, medical technology, and pharmacy students.
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper attempts to address the issue of how to effectively train the skills of donning and doffing personal protective equipment (PPE) in medical education. Specifically, the study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of 360° virtual reality (VR) training in teaching PPE donning and doffing techniques and compare it with traditional face-to-face training and video-based training. The background of the study points out that traditional training methods such as face-to-face and video-based training, while effective, may consume significant resources and present implementation challenges. Therefore, the main objective of the study is to determine whether 360° virtual reality training can serve as an effective, resource-saving alternative to enhance the skills of future healthcare practitioners in PPE usage. The study evaluates the effectiveness of different training methods through a randomized clinical trial, involving 2nd to 4th-year medical students, medical technology students, and pharmacy students from Teikyo University School of Medicine in Tokyo. The study is designed as a blind, prospective, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial, with participants randomly assigned to the VR group, face-to-face group, or video group, each receiving 30 minutes of relevant training. Three days later, all participants underwent a standardized practical skills test to assess their performance in PPE donning and doffing. The primary outcome measure of the study is the average score on the practical skills test, while the secondary outcome measure is the percentage of correctly performed steps in donning and doffing. The results of the study show that there is no significant difference in the practical skills test performance between the VR group and the face-to-face group, but both groups performed significantly better than the video group. This indicates that 360° virtual reality training can be an effective alternative to traditional face-to-face training, especially in resource-limited settings, with significant advantages in improving PPE donning and doffing skills.