Virtual reality as an engaging and enjoyable method for delivering emergency clinical simulation training: a prospective, interventional study of medical undergraduates

Risheka Walls,Priyanka Nageswaran,Adrian Cowell,Tunav Sehgal,Thomas White,James McVeigh,Stefan Staykov,Paul Basett,Daniel Mitelpunkt,Amir H. Sam
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-024-03433-9
IF: 9.3
2024-06-06
BMC Medicine
Abstract:It is a requirement that medical students are educated in emergencies and feel well prepared for practice as a doctor, yet national surveys show that many students feel underprepared. Virtual reality (VR), combined with 360-degree filming, provides an immersive, realistic, and interactive simulation experience. Unlike conventional in-person simulation, it is scalable with reduced workforce demands. We sought to compare students' engagement and enjoyment of VR simulation to desktop computer-based simulation.
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the inadequate preparation of medical students in emergency situations. Although medical education requires students to receive training and feel fully prepared in emergency situations, national surveys show that many students still feel under - prepared. Virtual Reality (VR) technology combined with 360 - degree filming can provide immersive, realistic and interactive simulation experiences. Compared with traditional face - to - face simulations, this technology is more scalable and reduces the demand for human resources. Therefore, the main purpose of the study is to compare students' engagement and enjoyment in VR simulations and desktop computer simulations in order to evaluate the effectiveness and potential of VR technology as a medical education tool. Specifically, the paper attempts to solve the problem in the following ways: 1. **Research Design**: A prospective intervention study was adopted, with the subjects being the final - year medical students (a total of 116) at Imperial College London School of Medicine, who were undergoing their pre - foundation assistant internships. 2. **Simulation Scenarios**: 360 - degree videos of two emergency situations, cardiac arrest and life - threatening asthma, were used for simulations on VR and desktop computers respectively. 3. **Measurement Methods**: Students' engagement was objectively measured through physiological parameters (such as heart rate and eye - tracking) and observer assessments (such as the Behavioural Engagement - related Instruction Protocol, BERI), and subjectively measured through questionnaires in terms of engagement and enjoyment. 4. **Data Analysis**: A mixed linear regression model was used to analyze the data and compare the effects of VR and desktop computer simulations in different scenarios. The research results show that the heart rate of students in VR simulations was significantly higher than that in desktop computer simulations, with an average difference of 4.2 beats per minute (95% confidence interval: 3.2 to 5.2, p < 0.001). Eye - tracking data show that students spent more time focusing on the scene in VR, with an average of 6.4% more time (95% confidence interval: 5.1 to 7.7, p < 0.001). In addition, students' subjective feedback also indicates that they prefer and feel more engaged in VR simulations. In conclusion, this study aims to explore the potential of VR technology in improving medical students' ability to handle emergency situations and their engagement by comparing the effects of VR and traditional desktop simulations.