Abstract:Questions around the technical and political feasibility of deep mitigation scenarios assessed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change have increasingly been raised as have calls for more directly analyzing and incorporating aspects of justice and fairness. Simultaneously, models are increasing the technical representation of novel carbon-dioxide removal (CDR) approaches to provide policy-relevant analyses of mitigation portfolios in the context of the rising number of net-zero CO2 and GHG targets made by parties to the Paris Agreement. Still, in most cost-effective mitigation scenarios developed by Integrated Assessment Models, a significant portion of mitigation is assumed to take place in developing regions. We address these intersecting questions through analyzing scenarios that include Direct Air Capture of CO2 with Storage (DACCS), a novel CDR technology that is not dependent on land potential and can be deployed widely, as well as regional variations in institutional capacity for mitigation based on country-level governance indicators. We find that including novel CDR and representations of institutional capacity can enhance both the feasibility and fairness of 2°C and 1.5°C high-overshoot scenarios, especially in the near term, with institutional capacity playing a stronger role than the presence of additional carbon removal methods. However, our results indicate that new CDR methods being studied by models are not likely to change regional mitigation outcomes of scenarios which achieve the 1.5°C goal of the Paris Agreement. Thus, while engineering carbon removals like DACCS may play a significant role by midcentury, gross emissions reductions in mitigation pathways arriving at net-zero CO2 emissions in line with 1.5°C do not substantially change. Our results highlight that further investment and development of novel CDR is critical for post-net-zero CO2 mitigation, but that equitable achievement of this milestone will need to arrive through technical and financial transfers, rather than by substantial carbon removals in developed countries.

Prioritizing Non-Carbon Dioxide Removal Mitigation Strategies Could Reduce the Negative Impacts Associated with Large-Scale Reliance on Negative Emissions

The role of carbon capture, utilization, and storage for economic pathways that limit global warming to below 1.5C

Between Scylla and Charybdis: Delayed mitigation narrows the passage between large-scale CDR and high costs

Ambitious efforts on residual emissions can reduce CO2 removal and lower peak temperatures in a net-zero future

The carbon dioxide removal gap

Deployment expectations of multi-gigatonne scale carbon removal could have adverse impacts on Asia's energy-water-land nexus

Diverse carbon dioxide removal approaches could reduce impacts on the energy–water–land system

Carbon dioxide removal technologies are not born equal

The global mismatch between equitable carbon dioxide removal liability and capacity

Carbon Dioxide Removal Could Perpetuate Community-Scale Inequalities of U.S. Air Pollution in Net-Zero Scenarios

CO2 removal and 1.5°C: what, when, where, and how?

Key uncertainties behind global projections of direct air capture deployment

Fairness and feasibility in deep mitigation pathways with novel carbon dioxide removal considering institutional capacity to mitigate

Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Removal: Long-Term Consequences and Commitment

Sustainability implications of different carbon dioxide removal technologies in the context of Europe's climate neutrality goal

The impact of regional resources and technology availability on carbon dioxide removal potential in the United States

Computing optimal carbon dioxide removal portfolios

Simulated Carbon Cycle and Earth System Response to Atmospheric CO2 Removal

Effects of Direct Air Capture Technology Availability on Stranded Assets and Committed Emissions in the Power Sector

The complementary role of carbon dioxide removal: A catalyst for advancing the COP28 pledges towards the 1.5 °C Paris Agreement target

Carbon dioxide removal: A source of ambition or of delays? Examining expectations for CDR in Swiss climate policy