Abstract:The Representative Concentration Pathway 2.6 (RCP2.6), which is broadly compatible with the Paris Agreement's temperature goal by 1.5-2°C, contains substantial reductions in agricultural non-CO2 emissions besides the deployment of Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR). Failing to mitigate agricultural methane and nitrous oxide emissions could contribute to an overshoot of the RCP2.6 warming by about 0.4°C. We explore using additional CDR to offset alternative agricultural non-CO2 emission pathways in which emissions either remain constant or rise. We assess the effects on the climate of calculating CDR rates to offset agricultural emission under two different approaches: relying on the 100-year global warming potential conversion metric (GWP100) and maintaining effective radiative forcing levels at exactly those of RCP2.6. Using a reduced-complexity climate model, we find that the conversion metric leads to a systematic underestimation of needed CDR, reaching only around 50% of the temperature mitigation needed to remain on the RCP2.6 track. This is mostly because the metric underestimates, in the near term, forcing from short-lived climate pollutants such as methane. We test whether alternative conversion metrics, the GWP20 and GWP*, are more suitable for offsetting purposes, and found that they both lead to an overestimation of the CDR requirements. Under alternative agricultural emissions pathways, holding to RCP2.6 total radiative forcing requires up to twice the amount of CDR that is already included in the RCP2.6. We examine the costs of this additional CDR, and the effects of internalizing these in several agricultural commodities. Assuming an average CDR cost by $150/tCO2, we find increases in prices of up to 41% for beef, 14% for rice, and 40% for milk in the United States relative to current retail prices. These figures are significantly higher (for beef and rice) under a global scenario, potentially threatening food security and welfare. Although the policy delivers a mechanism to finance the early deployment of CDR, using CDR to offset remaining high emissions may well hit other non-financial constraints and can thus only support, and not substitute, emission reductions.

Ambitious efforts on residual emissions can reduce CO2 removal and lower peak temperatures in a net-zero future

Prioritizing Non-Carbon Dioxide Removal Mitigation Strategies Could Reduce the Negative Impacts Associated with Large-Scale Reliance on Negative Emissions

Reducing sectoral hard-to-abate emissions to limit reliance on carbon dioxide removal

The role of carbon capture, utilization, and storage for economic pathways that limit global warming to below 1.5C

Model-based scenarios for achieving net negative emissions in the food system

The carbon dioxide removal gap

The complementary role of carbon dioxide removal: A catalyst for advancing the COP28 pledges towards the 1.5 °C Paris Agreement target

The global mismatch between equitable carbon dioxide removal liability and capacity

Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Removal: Long-Term Consequences and Commitment

Carbon Dioxide Removal Could Perpetuate Community-Scale Inequalities of U.S. Air Pollution in Net-Zero Scenarios

Carbon dioxide removal technologies are not born equal

Diverse carbon dioxide removal approaches could reduce impacts on the energy–water–land system

Mutual reinforcement of land-based carbon dioxide removal and international emissions trading in deep decarbonization scenarios

Between Scylla and Charybdis: Delayed mitigation narrows the passage between large-scale CDR and high costs

Simulated Carbon Cycle and Earth System Response to Atmospheric CO2 Removal

Offsetting unabated agricultural emissions with CO2 removal to achieve ambitious climate targets

Fairness and feasibility in deep mitigation pathways with novel carbon dioxide removal considering institutional capacity to mitigate

The impact of regional resources and technology availability on carbon dioxide removal potential in the United States

Taking stock of carbon dioxide removal policy in emerging economies: developments in Brazil, China, and India

Sustainability implications of different carbon dioxide removal technologies in the context of Europe's climate neutrality goal

CO2 removal and 1.5°C: what, when, where, and how?