Comparison of 8-weeks of full versus split body resistance training on appetite and energy intake in non-obese untrained men

Larissa Kelly Cardoso,Valéria L. G. Panissa,Jason Micheal Cholewa,Nathanael Leal Santana,Aldeni Silva Brito,Clara Andressa Barros,Esmeralda Maria Lustosa Barros,Rayane Carvalho de Moura,Paula A. Monteiro,Priscila A. Q. Rossi,Matheus Mesquita Vieira,Ahecio Kleber Araujo Brito,João Paulo Jacob Sabino,Nelo Eidy Zanchi,Fabrício Eduardo Rossi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-024-01432-w
2024-03-15
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Abstract:To investigate the effects of 8-weeks of full versus split body resistance training (RT) on appetite and energy intake in non-obese untrained men. The participants were pair-matched based on their initial fat mass and then randomly allocated into one of two treatment groups: Full body (FB, n = 20), in which all muscle groups were trained in every session, or Split body (SB, n = 15), in which upper and lower muscle groups were trained alternated per session; both groups trained in non-consecutive days, three times per week with total number of sets performed equated between groups. Energy intake, body composition, and strength performance were evaluated at pre-training, and after 8-weeks of RT, as well as self-reported hunger, fullness, and desire to eat, that were assessed at fasted and feed states pre- and post-intervention. FB and SB resistance training increased fat-free mass (FFM) ( p < 0.001); and FB induced greater maximal strength improvement ( p = 0.027). At fasted state self-reported hunger increased, and fullness decreased, while in feed state desire to eat something fatty increased in both groups. Carbohydrate intake ( p = 0.011) decreased in both groups. In conclusion, FB and SB training increased orexigenic drive (increasing hunger and decreasing fullness), however, total energy intake and fat mass did not change after 8-weeks of RT in non-obese untrained men.
nutrition & dietetics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?